Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Governing for resilience: a new epoch in U.S. environmental policy and politics?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of U.S. environmental policy has occurred through a series of three overlapping epochs, with each distinguished by differences in problem definition and policy objectives, implementation philosophies, points of intervention, policy tools, data and informational needs, political and institutional contexts, and key events and public actions. In the third environmental epoch, policy efforts have primarily been framed within the context of sustainability and focus on applying comprehensive, bottom-up policy and planning initiatives. Despite its practical approach for addressing cross-cutting environmental issues, the “sustainable communities” paradigm has fallen short of facilitating a transformation in which U.S. society subsists within the Earth system’s ecological limits. As a result of the sustainability epoch’s policy failures, environmental policy practitioners have increasingly applied the concept of resilience to frame policy discussions. This study draws from resilience theory and applies the environmental epoch framework to conceptualize the emergence of a fourth epoch in U.S. environmental politics and policy, governing for resilience. An examination of the features that distinguish an environmental epoch that centers on resilience contributes to theory and provides practical insight for policymakers by identifying opportunities to prepare for ongoing and unprecedented environmental challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the academic community has not developed a unifying definition of SES, the concept’s applications generally describe SES as the interdependency and mutual interactions between ecological and social systems at various scales (Colding and Barthel 2019).

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger N, Hodbod J (2014) Ecological and social resilience. In: Atkinson G, Dietz S, Neumayer E, Agarwala M (eds) Handbook of sustainable development, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 91–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern J (2013) Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc Ecol 28(6):1203–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (2009) H.R. 2454, 111th Cong

  • Anderies JM, Folke C, Walker B, Ostrom E (2013) Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol Soc 18(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J (2001) Adapting to Climate Change in Pacific Island Countries: The Problem of Uncertainty. World Development 29 (6):977–993

  • Benson MH, Craig RK (2014) The end of sustainability. Soc Nat Resour 27(7):777–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson MH, Garmestani AS (2011) Can we manage for resilience? The integration of resilience thinking into natural resource management in the United States. Environ Manag 48(3):392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards MD, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC (2012) Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37(1):421–448

  • Blackmore JM, Plant RAJ (2008) Risk and resilience to enhance sustainability with application to urban water systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg Philanthropies (2019) Climate action playbook brief. Bloomberg Philanthropies, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch DF (ed) (2008) Global warming and the free state: comprehensive assessment of climate change impacts in Maryland: report of the Scientific and Technical Working Group of the Maryland Commission on Climate Change. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Boicourt K, ZP Johnson (eds) (2010) Comprehensive strategy for reducing Maryland’s vulnerability to climate change, phase II: building societal, economic, and ecological resilience: report of the Maryland Commission on Climate Change, Adaptation and Response and Scientific and Technical Working Groups. Annapolis, Maryland: Department of Natural Resources

  • Bradberry LA, Jacobson GC (2015) The Tea Party and the 2012 presidential election. Elect Stud 40:500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C40 Cities (2020) Climate action planning framework. NY, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission (CEC) (2020) Cal-Adapt. Retrieved from:

  • California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) (2009) California Climate Adaptation Strategy. Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) (2018) Safeguarding California Plan: 2018 update. Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • California Senate Bill (S.B.) 379 (2015), Chapter 608 (Cal. State. 2015)

  • Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. American Planning Association Journal 62(3):296–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Westley F, Turner MG (2005) Surrogates for resilience of social–ecological systems. Ecosystems 8(8):941–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervenec J, Wilson AB, Dipre GR, Shockey A, Celebrezze D (2018) Columbus Climate Adaptation Plan. Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler D, Coaffee J (eds) (2017) The Routledge handbook of international resilience. Routledge, New York, New York

  • City of Austin (2014) Toward a Climate Resilient Austin. TX, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Boston (2014) Climate Ready Boston. MA, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Chula Vista (2011) Climate adaptation strategies. Chula Vista, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Indianapolis (2019) Thrive Indianapolis. City of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN

  • City of Long Beach (2019) Draft City of Long Beach Climate Action and Adaptation Plan. Long Beach, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Miami (2020) Miami: Forever Climate Ready. Miami, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • City of New York (2015) One New York: the plan for a strong and just city. NY, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • City of New York (2020) Mayor de Blasio appoints leading scientific experts to the fourth New York City Panel on Climate Change. The Official Website of the City of New York. Retrieved from: https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/430-20/mayor-de-blasio-appoints-leading-scientific-experts-the-fourth-new-york-city-panel-climate

  • City of Philadelphia (2015) Growing stronger: toward a climate-ready Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA

  • City of Portland (2014) Climate change preparation strategy. Portland, OR

  • City of Saint Paul (2019) Saint Paul Climate Action and Resilience Plan. Saint Paul, MN

  • City of San Antonio (2019) SA Climate Ready: a pathway for climate action & adaptation. San Antonio, Texas

  • City of St. Louis (2017) Climate action and adaptation plan. City of St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Virginia Beach (2020) Virginia Beach Sea Level Wise Adaptation Strategy. Virginia Beach, VA

  • Coaffee J (2013) Towards Next-Generation Urban Resilience in Planning Practice: From Securitization to Integrated Place Making. Planning Practice and Research 28(3):323–339

  • Colding J, Barthel S (2019) Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecol Soc 24(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conference of the Parties (2015) Paris Agreement, December 12, 2015 U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev/1

  • Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience (CCPR) (2014) Priority agenda enhancing the climate resilience of America’s Natural Resources. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) (2010) Progress report of the Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force: recommended actions in support of a National Climate Change Adaptation Strategy. Washington, D.C.

  • Cutter SL (2016) Resilience to what? Resilience for whom? Geogr J 182(2):110–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S (2012) Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? Plan Theory Pract 13:299–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn K, Buurman J, Mens M, Dahm R, Klijn F (2017) Resilience in practice: Five principles to enable societies to cope with extreme weather events. Environ Sci Policy 70:21–30

  • Delaware Department of Natural Resources (DDNR) (2012) Preparing for Tomorrow’s High Tide Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment for the State of Delaware. Dover, DE

    Google Scholar 

  • Denver Department of Environmental Health (DDEH) (2014) City and County of Denver Climate Adaptation Plan. Denver, CO

  • Djenontin INS, Meadow AM (2018) The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice. Environ Manag 61(6):885–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J, Pickering J (2019) The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Jacques PJ (2013) Climate change denial books and conservative think tanks: exploring the connection. Am Behav Sci 57:699–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2008) A widening gap - Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment 50(5):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp 144–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58(5):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant RF, Chun YP, Kim B, Lee S (2004) Toward a new governance paradigm for environmental and natural resources management in the 21st century? Adm Soc 35:643–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser SW, Dunlap RE (2013) Leading voices in the denier choir: conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. Am Behav Sci 57(6):754–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exec. Order No. 13514, 74 Fed. Reg. 194 (October 8, 2009) (2009)

  • Exec. Order No. 13653, 78 Fed. Reg. 215 (November 6, 2013) (2013)

  • Exec. Order No. 13693, 80 Fed. Reg. 90 (March 25, 2015) (2015)

  • Exec. Order No. 13783, 82 Fed. Reg. 61 (March 31, 2017) (2017)

  • Exec. Order No. 13834, 83 Fed. Reg. 99 (March 31, 2018) (2018)

  • Exec. Order No. 17-10, (September 15, 2017) (2017)

  • Executive Office of the President (EOP) (2013) The President’s Climate Action Plan. Washington, D.C.

  • FedCenter (2019). Climate adaptation: supporting information and tools. Retrieved from: https://www.fedcenter.gov/programs/climate/

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A journal of the human environment 31(5):437–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4)

  • Galford GL, Hoogenboom A, Carlson S, Ford S, Nash J, Palchak E, Pears S, Underwood K, Baker DV (eds) (2014) Considering Vermont’s future in a changing climate: the first Vermont Climate Assessment. Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

  • Global Change Research Act (GCRA) of 1990 (1990) 15 U.S.C. §§2921-2938

  • Global Resilient Cities Network (GRCN) (2020). Chief Resilience Officers from around the world announce the evolution and expansion of the Global Resilient Cities Network [press release]. Retrieved from: https://www.rockpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/GRCN-WUF-Press-Release-Network.pdf

  • Governor’s Action Team on Energy and Climate (GATEC) (2008) Florida’s Energy & Climate Change Action Plan. Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (GOPR) (2020) About the Adaptation Clearinghouse. Resilient.CA.org. Retrieved from: https://resilientca.org/about/

  • Governor’s Steering Committee on Climate Change (GSC) (2010) The impacts of climate change on Connecticut agriculture, infrastructure, natural resources and public health. Hartford, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Lakes Integrated Sciences and Assessment and the University of Michigan Climate Center (GLISA and UMCC) (2016) Climate change in Columbus Ohio: an assessment of Columbus’ key climate changes, impacts, and vulnerabilities of concern. Columbus, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glasser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495(7441):305–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guggenheim, D. (2006). An inconvenient truth. Lawrence Bender and Participant Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31(1):425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Holling C (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel L (1998) Sustainable communities: from vision to action. The Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel L (2009) Conceptual and analytical challenges in building sustainable communities. In: Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (eds) Toward sustainable communities: transition and transformations in environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, pp 33-62

  • Hempel L (2012) Evolving concepts of sustainability in environmental policy. In: Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (eds) Towards sustainable communities: transition and transformation in environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1996) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems, and incentives for people. Ecol Appl 6(3):733–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R, Bader D, Kushnir Y, Little C, Blake R, Rosenzweig C (2015) New York City Panel on Climate Change 2015 Report. Chapter 1: Climate observations and projections. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1336(1):18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House Bill (HB) 3543 (2007) 74th Oregon General Assembly

  • Hunt J (2009) Integrated policies for environmental resilience and sustainability. Eng Sustain 162:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICLEI (2019) Resilient cities, thriving cities: the evolution of urban resilience. Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Climate Adaptation Team (ICAT). (2017) Adapting to climate change in Minnesota. Saint Paul, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014a) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014b) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M, Waterfield T (eds) Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

  • IPBES (2019) Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, and Ngo HT (eds). Bonn, Germany, IPBES secretariat

  • Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics 17(3):349–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klyza CM, Sousa D (2008) American environmental policy, 1990–2006: beyond gridlock. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Knab RD, Rhome JR, Brown DP (2011) Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina. National Hurricane Center. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft ME (2018) Environmental policy and politics, 7th edn. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft ME (2021) Environmental policy in congress. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME, Rabe BG (eds) Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century. CQ Press, Thousand Oaks, California, pp 111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Kyoto Protocol) (1998) December 10, 1997 37 I.L.M. 22; 2303 U.N.T.S. 148; U.N. Doc FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1

  • Layzer JA (2007) Deep freeze: how business has shaped the global warming debate in congress. In: Kraft M, Kamieniecki S (eds) Business and environmental policy: corporate interests in the American political system. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Layzer JA (2014) Open for business: conservatives’ opposition to environmental regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew AA, Ng PT, Ni C, Wu T (2016) Community sustainability and resilience: similarities, differences and indicators. Tour Geogr 18:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenko J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor WM (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde G, Chmutina K, Bosher L, Dainty A (2015) Sustainability and resilience in the built environment: the challenges of establishing a turquoise agenda in the UK. Sustain Cities Soc 15:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MDEP) (2010) People and nature: adapting to climate change. Augusta, ME

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser C (1997) Sustainable community development: principles and concepts. St. Lucie Press, Del Ray, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason L (2015) “I disrespectfully agree”: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Am J Polit Sci 59(1):128–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauger, G.G., Casola, J.H., Morgan, H.A., Strauch, R.L., Jones, B., Curry, B., Busch Isaksen, T.M., Whitely Binder, L., Krodby, M.B., & Snover, A.K. (2015). State of knowledge: climate change in Puget Sound. Report prepared for the Puget Sound Partnership and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Seattle, WA: Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington.

  • Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (eds) (2009a) Towards sustainable communities: transition and transformation in environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (2009b) The three epochs of the environmental movement. In: Mazmanian DA, Kraft ME (eds) Towards sustainable communities: transition and transformation in environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 3–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian DA, Nijaki LK (2012) Sustainable development and governance. In: Kraft ME, Kamieniecki S (eds) The Oxford handbook of US environmental policy. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, pp 184–206

    Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2000) Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Soc Probl 47(4):499–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2003) Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc Probl 50(3):348–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2014a) Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006–12. Weather, Climate, and Society 6(2):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Xiao C, Dunlap RE (2014b) Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012. Soc Sci Res 48:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(8):889–909

  • Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2018) Costliest U.S, tropical cyclones. National Hurricane Center. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32(1):395–419

  • Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2011) Wisconsin’s changing climate: impacts and adaptation. Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) (2009) The New Hampshire Climate Action Plan. Concord, NH

    Google Scholar 

  • Normandin JM, Therrien MC, Pelling M, Paterson S (2019) The definition of urban resilience: a transformation path towards collaborative urban risk governance. Urban Resilience for Risk and Adaptation Governance:9–25

  • Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (OCCRI) (2010). Oregon climate assessment report. Field KD, Dello, Mote PW, Corvallis OR (eds). College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

  • Pealer S, Dunnington G (2011) Climate change and Vermont’s waters. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Montpelier, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Climate Change Act of 2008 (2008) P.L. 935, No. 70

  • Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PDEP) (2011) Pennsylvania climate adaptation report. PA, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney KE (2013) Taking sustainable cities seriously: economic development, the environment and quality of life in American cities, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney KE, Hannibal B (2021) Sustainability and resilience in cities: what cities are doing. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME, Rabe BG (eds) Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century. CQ Press, Thousand Oaks, California, pp 249–274

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s State, Local, and Tribal Leaders Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience (Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience) (2014) Recommendations to the president. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press D, Mazmanian DA (2006) The greening of industry: combining government regulation and voluntary strategies. In: Vig and Kraft (eds) Environmental policy, 6th edn, pp 264–287

  • Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2010) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16(4):407–438

  • Prior T, Hagmann J (2013) Measuring resilience: Methodological and political challenges of a trend security concept. Journal of Risk Research 17(3):281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabe BG (2004) Statehouse and greenhouse: the emerging politics of American climate change policy. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman CL (2014) Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecol Soc 19(2)

  • Rogers JD, Kemp GP, Bosworth HJ Jr, Seed RB (2015) Interaction between the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Orleans Levee Board preceding the drainage canal wall failures and catastrophic flooding of New Orleans in 2005. Water Policy 17(4):707–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roser M, Ortiz-Ospina E (2017) World population growth. Our World in Data

  • Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N, Loy C, Krausmann F (2014) The global metabolic transition: regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950–2010. Glob Environ Chang 26:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seattle Office of Sustainability and Environment (SOSE) (2017) Carbon neutral climate ready: preparing for climate change. Seattle, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2016) Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1654–1677

  • Skocpol T (2013) Naming the problem: what it will take to counter extremism and engage Americans in the fight against global warming. Harvard University, Symposium on the Politics of America’s Fight Against Global Warming

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Delaware (2014) Climate framework for Delaware. Dover, DE

    Google Scholar 

  • State of North Carolina (2020) Climate risk assessment and resilience plan. Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Oregon (2010) The Oregon Climate Change Adaptation Framework. Salem, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2007) The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(8):614–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SE, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GG, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223):1259855–1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S, Moench M, (2012) A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development 4 (4):311–326

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2018). Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, volume II. Reidmiller CW, Avery DR, Easterling KE, Kunkel KLM, Lewis TK, Maycock, Stewart BC (eds). U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C.  

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2012) Resilience practice: building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Anderies JM, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen MA, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard L (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2)

  • Walker BH, Gunderson LH, Kinzig AP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker JA, de Jong A, Knoop JM, van der Sluijs JP (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(6):987–998

  • Wardekker A, Wilk B, Brown V, Uittenbroek C, Mees H, Driessen P, Wassn M, Molenaar A, Walda J, Runhaar H (2020) A diagnostic tool for supporting policymaking on urban resilience. Cities 101:102691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington Department of Ecology (WDE) (2012) Preparing for a changing climate. Washington State’s integrated climate response strategy, Olympia, WA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber EP (2003) Bringing society back in: grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Western Water Assessment (WWA) (2011) Colorado Climate Preparedness Project: final report. Regents of the University of Colorado, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson V, Skocpol T, Coggin J (2011) The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. Perspectives on Politics 9:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff SC, Meerow S, Stults M, Wilkins C (2018) Adaptation to resilience planning: alternative pathways to prepare for climate change. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1-12

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Lehman College of the City University of New York, 250 Bedford Park Boulevard W, Bronx, NY, 10468, USA

    Duran Fiack

Authors
  1. Duran Fiack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duran Fiack.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 16 State climate adaptation objectives
Full size table
Table 17 City climate adaptation objectives
Full size table
Table 18 The four Epochs of U.S. environmental policy (adapted from Mazmanian and Kraft 2009b)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiack, D. Governing for resilience: a new epoch in U.S. environmental policy and politics?. J Environ Stud Sci 12, 43–80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00685-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00685-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation