Skip to main content
Log in

Physics audit of selected diagnostic X-Ray machines in Ghana: towards implementation of a national dosimetry audit programme

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This work aimed to conduct Physics Audit of selected diagnostic X-ray machines in Ghana, with the purpose of serving as a pilot study towards establishing a national need to ensure the safe use of radiation in healthcare.

Methods

Analysis of equipment and staffing data and assessment of the X-ray systems’ performance were undertaken in the study. Tests performed on the systems include accuracy, reproducibility, and linearity of the X-ray tube potential, Half-Value Layer (HVL), beam alignment and congruence, tube current linearity, and assessment of entrance surface doses.

Results

All twenty-seven X-ray machines piloted in the project were within tolerances for half-value layer and congruence tests. While a single X-ray system was out-of-tolerance for beam alignment test, 19% were out-of-tolerance for both kVp accuracy and reproducibility. Contrast and spatial resolution tests on the X-ray machines were within tolerance of ± 10%. Mean entrance surface doses estimated for selected body regions ranged from 1.1 mGy for cervical spine anterior-posterior to 6.7 mGy for lumbar spine lateral. None of the radiology centres was found to engage the services of a Medical Physicists at the time.

Conclusions

Analyzed data from the pilot study has presented experiences to guide implementation of the audit project at national level. This is the first of such audit study performed in Ghana and West Africa sub-region.

Significance

• The audit aims to make significant contributions for improving radiological safety of patients in the diagnostic X-ray installations in the country.

• The study pilots implementation of a national dosimetry audit programme.

• Physics audit ensures maintenance of total quality management through quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) programmes in the diagnostic X-ray facilities.

• The study presents data that can be benchmarked with further physics audit work to be implemented nationally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that was used to prepare the manuscript is available upon request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation volume I: Sources, UNSCEAR 2000 Report. 2000. https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2000/UNSCEAR_2000_Report_Vol.I.pdf

  2. Bárdyová Z, Horváthová M, Pinčáková K, Budošová D. The importance of public health in radiology and radiation protection. J Public Health Res. 2021;10(3):2141. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2141. PMID: 33709644; PMCID: PMC8239619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah SSUD, Khan BA, Zahoor M, Ullah R, Khan FA, Sultan MA. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the Medical Field: a review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5164970. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5164970. PMID: 35707373; PMCID: PMC9192206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Willemse M.M., Williams M., Grobler A.D., Radiographers’ experiences of the management of quality assurance programmes in public hospitals, South Africa, Radiography, 2020, Volume 26, Issue 1; e1-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.05.007.

  5. Jabbari N, Zeinali A, Rahmatnezhad L. Patient dose from radiographic rejects/repeats in radiology centers of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Health. 2012;4(2):94–100. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2012.42015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nocum DJ, Robinson J, Reed W. The role of quality improvement in radiography. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68(3):214–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.524. Epub 2021 Jul 2. PMID: 34214234; PMCID: PMC8424326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ofori EK, Antwi WK and Scutt DN. Current status of quality assurance in diagnostic imaging departments in Ghana. The South African Radiographer. 2013;51(2):19–25. - https://journals.co.za/doi/https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC148179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series No. 457. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: An international code of practice. TRS457 (2007) https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TRS457_web.pdf

  9. International Atomic Energy Agency ((IAEA) TECDOC-1423). Optimisation of the radiological protection of patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography. Report of a coordinated research project in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe. IAEA-TEC-DOC-1423. 2004. IAEA, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1423_web.pdf

  10. European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No GSR Part 3. 2014. IAEA, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf

  11. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, publication EUR 16260 EN. 1996, Brussels, Belgium. (CEC 1996). https://www.sprmn.pt/pdf/EuropeanGuidelineseur16260.pdf

  12. Public Health England. Guidance: National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). 2016. (UK 2016). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls

  13. Rehani, MM. Protection of patients in general radiography. In International Conference 26Y30, Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. 2001 (IAEA 2001). Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=32064812

  14. Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF, Hobbs BB, Mettler FA, Pizzutiello RJ, et al. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology. 2005;235(2):354–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352020016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Comprehensive Clinical Audits of Diagnostic Radiology Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement. Quality Assurance Audit for Diagnostic Radiology Improvement and Learning (QUAADRIL). Hum Heal Ser 4. 2010. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1425_web.pdf

Download references

Funding

No direct funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the various stages of the study and the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kofi Okyere Akyea-Larbi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no impending conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sosu, E.K., Boadu, M., Hasford, F. et al. Physics audit of selected diagnostic X-Ray machines in Ghana: towards implementation of a national dosimetry audit programme. Health Technol. 13, 791–798 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00777-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00777-9

Keywords

Navigation