Abstract
Purpose
This work aimed to conduct Physics Audit of selected diagnostic X-ray machines in Ghana, with the purpose of serving as a pilot study towards establishing a national need to ensure the safe use of radiation in healthcare.
Methods
Analysis of equipment and staffing data and assessment of the X-ray systems’ performance were undertaken in the study. Tests performed on the systems include accuracy, reproducibility, and linearity of the X-ray tube potential, Half-Value Layer (HVL), beam alignment and congruence, tube current linearity, and assessment of entrance surface doses.
Results
All twenty-seven X-ray machines piloted in the project were within tolerances for half-value layer and congruence tests. While a single X-ray system was out-of-tolerance for beam alignment test, 19% were out-of-tolerance for both kVp accuracy and reproducibility. Contrast and spatial resolution tests on the X-ray machines were within tolerance of ± 10%. Mean entrance surface doses estimated for selected body regions ranged from 1.1 mGy for cervical spine anterior-posterior to 6.7 mGy for lumbar spine lateral. None of the radiology centres was found to engage the services of a Medical Physicists at the time.
Conclusions
Analyzed data from the pilot study has presented experiences to guide implementation of the audit project at national level. This is the first of such audit study performed in Ghana and West Africa sub-region.
Significance
• The audit aims to make significant contributions for improving radiological safety of patients in the diagnostic X-ray installations in the country.
• The study pilots implementation of a national dosimetry audit programme.
• Physics audit ensures maintenance of total quality management through quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) programmes in the diagnostic X-ray facilities.
• The study presents data that can be benchmarked with further physics audit work to be implemented nationally.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that was used to prepare the manuscript is available upon request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation volume I: Sources, UNSCEAR 2000 Report. 2000. https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2000/UNSCEAR_2000_Report_Vol.I.pdf
Bárdyová Z, Horváthová M, Pinčáková K, Budošová D. The importance of public health in radiology and radiation protection. J Public Health Res. 2021;10(3):2141. doi: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2141. PMID: 33709644; PMCID: PMC8239619.
Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah SSUD, Khan BA, Zahoor M, Ullah R, Khan FA, Sultan MA. Modern diagnostic imaging technique applications and risk factors in the Medical Field: a review. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5164970. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5164970. PMID: 35707373; PMCID: PMC9192206.
Willemse M.M., Williams M., Grobler A.D., Radiographers’ experiences of the management of quality assurance programmes in public hospitals, South Africa, Radiography, 2020, Volume 26, Issue 1; e1-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2019.05.007.
Jabbari N, Zeinali A, Rahmatnezhad L. Patient dose from radiographic rejects/repeats in radiology centers of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Health. 2012;4(2):94–100. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2012.42015
Nocum DJ, Robinson J, Reed W. The role of quality improvement in radiography. J Med Radiat Sci. 2021;68(3):214–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.524. Epub 2021 Jul 2. PMID: 34214234; PMCID: PMC8424326.
Ofori EK, Antwi WK and Scutt DN. Current status of quality assurance in diagnostic imaging departments in Ghana. The South African Radiographer. 2013;51(2):19–25. - https://journals.co.za/doi/https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC148179
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Technical Report Series No. 457. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: An international code of practice. TRS457 (2007) https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TRS457_web.pdf
International Atomic Energy Agency ((IAEA) TECDOC-1423). Optimisation of the radiological protection of patients undergoing radiography, fluoroscopy and computed tomography. Report of a coordinated research project in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe. IAEA-TEC-DOC-1423. 2004. IAEA, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/te_1423_web.pdf
European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, IAEA Safety Standards Series No GSR Part 3. 2014. IAEA, Vienna. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf
European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, publication EUR 16260 EN. 1996, Brussels, Belgium. (CEC 1996). https://www.sprmn.pt/pdf/EuropeanGuidelineseur16260.pdf
Public Health England. Guidance: National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). 2016. (UK 2016). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls
Rehani, MM. Protection of patients in general radiography. In International Conference 26Y30, Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. 2001 (IAEA 2001). Available from: https://inis.iaea.org/search/searchsinglerecord.aspx?recordsFor=SingleRecord&RN=32064812
Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF, Hobbs BB, Mettler FA, Pizzutiello RJ, et al. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology. 2005;235(2):354–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352020016
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Comprehensive Clinical Audits of Diagnostic Radiology Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement. Quality Assurance Audit for Diagnostic Radiology Improvement and Learning (QUAADRIL). Hum Heal Ser 4. 2010. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1425_web.pdf
Funding
No direct funding was received for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the various stages of the study and the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no impending conflict of interest relevant to this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sosu, E.K., Boadu, M., Hasford, F. et al. Physics audit of selected diagnostic X-Ray machines in Ghana: towards implementation of a national dosimetry audit programme. Health Technol. 13, 791–798 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00777-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-023-00777-9