Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Communicating Commitment to Antibiotic Stewardship: an Effective Strategy for Responding to Online Patient Reviews

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Public health officials have worked to address the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. To slow the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, it is important to improve patients’ understanding of antibiotics and adjust their expectations of them. This study explores strategic antibiotic resistance communication between patients and health care providers in an online review platform.

Methods

Based on two experimental studies, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the provider’s commitment messaging when dealing with patients’ complaints about not receiving requested antibiotics during their visit.

Results

The findings from study 1 show that communicating the commitment to antibiotic stewardship makes participants have more favorable feelings toward the provider. Commitment messaging also makes readers perceive the provider as more credible, and they are more willing to visit the clinic in the future. Study 2 findings demonstrate a robustness of commitment messaging in increasing readers’ willingness to visit the clinic, while the provider’s response exhibits the limited impact of correcting patients’ common misunderstandings of antibiotics and adjusting their expectations of antibiotics.

Conclusions

Our findings illustrate some clear benefits of engaging with negative online patient reviews to minimize potential reputational damage and reestablish the credibility of care providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adedeji WA. The treasure called antibiotics. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2016;14:56–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. CDC. Antibiotic resistance threatens everyone. Cent Dis Control Prev. 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 2]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/index.html.

  3. Butler CC, Rollnick S, Pill R, Maggs-Rapport F, Stott N. Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats. BMJ. 1998;317:637–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Macfarlane R, Britten N. Influence of patients’ expectations on antibiotic management of acute lower respiratory tract illness in general practice: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997;315:1211–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sirota M, Round T, Samaranayaka S, Kostopoulou O. Expectations for antibiotics increase their prescribing: causal evidence about localized impact. Health Psychol. 2017;36:402–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zetts RM, Stoesz A, Smith BA, Hyun DY. Outpatient antibiotic use and the need for increased antibiotic stewardship efforts. Pediatrics. 2018;141: e20174124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenna M. The “Yelp Effect” of patient surveys is making us sick. Wired. 2018 Mar 22 [cited 2020 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/the-yelping-of-the-american-doctor/.

  8. Shapiro E. Injudicious antibiotic use: an unforeseen consequence of the emphasis on patient satisfaction?. Clin Ther. 2002;24:197–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emmert M, Sauter L, Jablonski L, Sander U, Taheri-Zadeh F. Do physicians respond to web-based patient ratings?. An analysis of physicians’ responses to more than one million web-based ratings over a six-year period. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19: e275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311:734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Turner MM, Choung H, Bui Q-HHM, Beck P, Ashraf H. Reversing the antibiotic resistance “Yelp Effect” through the use of emotionally framed responses to negative reviews of providers: questionnaire study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6:e26122.

  12. Conlon DE, Murray NM. Customer perceptions of corporate responses to product complaints: the role of explanations. Acad Manage J. 1996;39:1040–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CH, Cranage DA. Toward understanding consumer processing of negative online word-of-mouth communication: the roles of opinion consensus and organizational response strategies. J Hosp Tour Res. SAGE Publications Inc. 2014;38:330–60.

  14. Arendt F, Forrai M, Findl O. Dealing with negative reviews on physician-rating websites: an experimental test of how physicians can prevent reputational damage via effective response strategies. Soc Sci Med. 2020;266: 113422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson & Company. 1957.

  16. Guadagno RE, Cialdini RB. Preference for consistency and social influence: a review of current research findings. Soc Influ. 2010;5:152–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrova PK, Cialdini RB, Sills SJ. Consistency-based compliance across cultures. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007;43:104–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burger JM. The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: a multiple-process analysis and review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3:303–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. CDC. United States gathers 350 commitments to combat antibiotic resistance, action must continue [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 3]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p0923-combat-antibiotic-resistance.html.

  20. Meeker D, Knight TK, Friedberg MW, Linder JA, Goldstein NJ, Fox CR, et al. Nudging guideline-concordant antibiotic prescribing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lwin MO, Pang A, Loh J-Q, Peh MH-Y, Rodriguez SA, Zelani NHB. Is saying ‘sorry’ enough? Examining the effects of apology typologies by organizations on consumer responses. Asian J Commun. 2017;27:49–64.

  22. Bottom WP, Gibson K, Daniels SE, Murnighan JK. When talk Is not cheap: substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organ Sci. INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research; 2002;13:497–513.

  23. Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD, Dirks KT. Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:104–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA, Elliott MN, Krogstad P, Brook RH. The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior. Pediatrics. 1999;103:711–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Szymczak JE, Feemster KA, Zaoutis TE, Gerber JS. Pediatrician perceptions of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:S69-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Broniatowski DA, Klein EY, May L, Martinez EM, Ware C, Reyna VF. Patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory infections in the acute care setting. Med Decis Making. SAGE Publications Inc STM. 2018;38:547–61.

  27. Black L, Adjaye-Gbewonyo D. Urgent care center and retail health clinic utilization among adults: United States, 2019. National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.). 2021 Jun. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/106463.

  28. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Becheur I, Valette-Florence P. The use of negative emotions in health communication messages: Study of the effects of fear, guilt, and shame. Rech Appl En Mark Engl Ed. 2014;29:89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dillard JP, Anderson JW. The role of fear in persuasion. Psychol Mark. 2004;21:909–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Turner MM. Using emotional appeals in health messages. In: Cho H, editor. Health Commun Message Des Theory Pract. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2011. p. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Office of the Vice President for Research, The George Washington University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Monique M. Turner

  2. College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Hyesun Choung

Authors
  1. Monique M. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyesun Choung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyesun Choung.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedure performed in studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study 1 stimulus message

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Study 2 stimulus message

Full size image
Table 2 Summary of survey questionnaires and reliability coefficients
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, M.M., Choung, H. Communicating Commitment to Antibiotic Stewardship: an Effective Strategy for Responding to Online Patient Reviews. Int.J. Behav. Med. 30, 416–423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10102-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10102-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation