Skip to main content
Log in

Setup time analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy in O-ring linear accelerator without rotational correction

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyse setup time (ST) and frequency of on-board imaging for stereotactic abdomen (liver, stomach), lung, and spine radiotherapy in the absence of automatic rotational correction. Total 53 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients, 28 of abdomen, 19 lung, and 6 spine treated for 230 sessions in O-ring gantry accelerator were evaluated for ST analysis. The mean setup time for all patients, abdomen, lung, and spine cases were 7.7 ± 7.4 min, 9.2 ± 9.2 min, 6.3 ± 4.1 min, and 5.5 ± 3.3 min, respectively. Median number CBCT was 2. 96% of cases had a CBCT between 1 and 3, and 9 (4%) had ≥ 4 CBCTs. Overall, 38.1%, 35.5%, 22.1%, 2.2%, and 2.2% of setup time fall into window of 0–5 min, 5–10 min, 10–20 min, 20–30 min, and > 30 min. Most difficult challenge is to negotiate with unknown rotational errors. It will be easy to dealt with them without automatic rotational correction if values are known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoogeman MS, Nuyttens JJ, Levendag PC, Heijmen BJ. Time dependence of intrafraction patient motion assessed by repeat stereoscopic imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(2):609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver M, Ansbacher W, Beckham WA. Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009;10(4):117–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Güngör G, Serbez İ, Temur B, Gür G, Kayalılar N, Mustafayev TZ, Korkmaz L, Aydın G, Yapıcı B, Atalar B, Özyar E. Time analysis of online adaptive magnetic resonance–guided radiation therapy workflow according to anatomical sites. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021;11(1):e11-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crop F, Lacornerie T, Szymczak H, Felin A, Bailleux C, Mirabel X, Lartigau E. Treatment and technical intervention time analysis of a robotic stereotactic radiotherapy system. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014;13(1):29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Munshi A, Krishnakutty S, Sarkar B, Ganesh T, Mohanti BK. Daily waiting and treatment times at an advanced radiation oncology setup: a 4-year audit of consecutive patients from single institution. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021;17(2):523–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Timmerman R, Paulus R, Galvin J, Michalski J, Straube W, Bradley J, Fakiris A, Bezjak A, Videtic G, Johnstone D, Fowler J. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer. JAMA. 2010;303(11):1070–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer J, Wilbert J, Baier K, Guckenberger M, Richter A, Sauer O, Flentje M. Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(4):1220–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar B, Ray J, Ganesh T, Manikandan A, Munshi A, Rathinamuthu S, Kaur H, Anbazhagan S, Giri UK, Roy S, Jassal K. Methodology to reduce 6D patient positional shifts into a 3D linear shift and its verification in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(7): 075004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jarema T, Aland T. Using the iterative kV CBCT reconstruction on the Varian Halcyon linear accelerator for radiation therapy planning for pelvis patients. Physica Med. 2019;68:112–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pokhrel D, Visak J, Critchfield LC, Stephen J, Bernard ME, Randall M, Kudrimoti M. Clinical validation of ring-mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: comparison to SBRT-dedicated C-arm linac treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(1):261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarkar B, Ghosh T, Biswal SS, Shahid T, Ganesh T. In regards to Pokhrel et al. Clinical validation of ring‐mounted halcyon linac for lung SBRT: Comparison to SBRT‐dedicated C‐arm linac treatments. JACMP 2021; 22(1): 261‐70. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(6):281–2.

  12. Manikandan A, Sarkar B, Munshi A, Krishnankutty S, Ganesh T, Mohanti BK, Manikandan S, Anirudh P, Chandrasekharan S. Calculation of set-up margin in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy accounting for translational and rotational patient positing error. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19(2):169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins J, Bezjak A, Hope A, Panzarella T, Li W, Cho JB, Craig T, Brade A, Sun A, Bissonnette JP. Effect of image-guidance frequency on geometric accuracy and setup margins in radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. In: Seminars in radiation oncology, vol. 14, No. 1. WB Saunders; 2004, pp. 52–64

  15. Takakura T, Mizowaki T, Nakata M, Yano S, Fujimoto T, Miyabe Y, Nakamura M, Hiraoka M. The geometric accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6D robotic couch system. Phys Med Biol. 2009;55(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li W, Purdie TG, Taremi M, Fung S, Brade A, Cho BJ, Hope A, Sun A, Jaffray DA, Bezjak A, Bissonnette JP. Effect of immobilization and performance status on intrafraction motion for stereotactic lung radiotherapy: analysis of 133 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(5):1568–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar B, Ganesh T, Munshi A, Manikandan A, Roy S, Krishnankutty S, Chitral L, Sathiya J, Pradhan A, Mohanti BK. Rotational positional error-corrected linear set-up margin calculation technique for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in a dual imaging environment of 4-D cone beam CT and ExacTrac stereoscopic imaging. Radiol Med (Torino). 2021;126(7):979–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roy S, Sarkar B, Pradhan A, Munshi A, Chauhan R. Patient wait times for daily outpatient radiotherapy appointments (a single-centre study). J Radiother Pract. 2023;22: e88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BS: data collection, and analysis, writing, reviewing, and submission of final draft. AP: writing, statistical analysis, and answering reviewer comment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biplab Sarkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval obtained from Apollo Multispeciality Hospitals Institutional Ethical Committee Kolkata (Host institution).

Informed consent (only if applicable)

Not required.

Patient consent statement

Patient treatment consent is obtained.

Consent to publish

Yes.

Data availability statement

Available with author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 611 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarkar, B., Pradhan, A. Setup time analysis for stereotactic body radiotherapy in O-ring linear accelerator without rotational correction. Radiol Phys Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00791-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00791-0

Keywords

Navigation