Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of image reconstruction methods on the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema with convolutional neural network

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on computed tomography (CT) images when training convolutional neural network (CNN) models to diagnose pulmonary emphysema. To evaluate the influence of the IR algorithm on CNN, the present study comprised two steps: the comparison of noise reduction by IR algorithms using phantom examinations and the change in performance of CNN with IR algorithms using patient data. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients. Raw CT data were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) algorithms with blending levels of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The models were trained using reconstructed CT images and were named the FBP, ASIR-V30, ASIR-V50, and ASIR-V70 models. The mean and the standard deviation of the CT values were 11.3 ± 21.2 at FBP, 11.0 ± 17.3 at ASIR-V30, 11.0 ± 14.4 at ASIR-V50, and 11.0 ± 11.8 at ASIR-V70. For all the evaluation metrics, the best values were obtained with the FBP model applied to the ASIR-V70 test images. The worst values were obtained with the ASIR-V70 model applied to the FBP test images. The model trained with FBP images exhibited significantly better performance than the models trained using IR images. The reduction in image noise with the IR algorithm on the test images contributed to improving the accuracy of the classification of emphysema subtypes using CNN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GBD. Chronic respiratory disease collaborators, global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;2017(5):691–706.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:347–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishio M, Nakane K, Kubo T, et al. Automated prediction of emphysema visual score using homology-based quantification of low-attenuation lung region. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0178217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch DA, Austin JHM, Hogg JC, et al. CT-definable subtypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a statement of the fleischner society. Radiology. 2015;277:192–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nambu A, Zach J, Kim SS, et al. Significance of low-attenuation cluster analysis on quantitative CT in the evaluation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Korean J Radiol. 2018;19:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarnalo COM, Linsen PVM, Blazís SP, et al. Clinical evaluation of a deep-learning-based computer-aided detection system for the detection of pulmonary nodules in a large teaching hospital. Clin Radiol. 2021;76:838–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blazís SP, Dickerscheid DBM, Linsen PVM, et al. Effect of CT reconstruction settings on the performance of a deep learning based lung nodule CAD system. Eur J Radiol. 2021;136: 109526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu C, Qi S, Feng J, et al. DCT-MIL: deep CNN transferred multiple instance learning for COPD identification using CT images. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65: 145011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bermejo-Peláez D, Ash SY, Washko GR, et al. Classification of interstitial lung abnormality patterns with an ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep. 2020;10:338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Humphries SM, Notary AM, Centeno JP, et al. Deep learning enables automatic classification of emphysema pattern at CT. Radiology. 2020;294:434–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mets OM, Willemink MJ, de Kort FP, et al. The effect of iterative reconstruction on computed tomography assessment of emphysema, air trapping and airway dimensions. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2103–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Castaldi PJ, Estépar RSJ, Mendoza CS, et al. Distinct quantitative computed tomography emphysema patterns are associated with physiology and function in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:1083–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim K, Kwon H, Cho J, et al. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:443–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen L, Jin C, Li J, et al. Image quality comparison of two adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR, ASiR-V) algorithms and filtered back projection in routine liver CT. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inform Proc Syst. 2012;25:1097–105.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeiler MD. ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv. 2012;1212.5701

  17. Goddard PR, Nicholson EM, Laszlo G, et al. Computed tomography in pulmonary emphysema. Clin Radiol. 1982;33:379–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kagimoto A, Mimura T, Miyamoto T, et al. Severity of emphysema as a prognosticator of resected early lung cancer: an analysis classified by Goddard score. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;5(50):1043–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, et al. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Venice: IEEE. 2017;618–626

  20. Gao Y, Xiong J, Shen C, et al. Improving robustness of a deep learning-based lung-nodule classification model of CT images with respect to image noise. Phys Med Biol. 2021;7(66):10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiki Takeshita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Teikyo University (approval number: 19-036-2).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeshita, T., Nambu, A., Tago, M. et al. The influence of image reconstruction methods on the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema with convolutional neural network. Radiol Phys Technol 16, 488–496 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00736-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00736-z

Keywords

Navigation