Abstract
Purpose of Review
To assess the validity of the belief that anticoagulation is not beneficial in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS), and to asssess the benefits and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Recent Findings
The failure of randomized trials to show benefit of anticoagulation in ESUS is probably due to misclassification of large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) as ESUS, as defined by a stenosis ≥ 50%. There are important differences among DOACs. There are a number of problems with dabigatran, and rivaroxaban and edoxaban are not suitable for once-daily dosing. Recent evidence from real-world practice indicates that apixaban is more effective and safer than rivaroxaban.
Summary
Plaque burden should be included in the definition of LAA. Patients in whom a cardioembolic source is strongly suspected should be anticoagulated; antiplatelet agents are not significantly safer than DOACs, and are not effective in cardioembolic stroke.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7.
Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H, Kasner SE, Bangdiwala SI, Berkowitz SD, et al. Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(23):2191–201. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802686.
Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD, Granger CB, Bernstein RA, Uchiyama S, et al. Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1906–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813959.
Kasner SE, Swaminathan B, Lavados P, Sharma M, Muir K, Veltkamp R, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for patent foramen ovale and embolic stroke of undetermined source: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the NAVIGATE ESUS trial. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(12):1053–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30319-3.
Fuentes B, Gutierrez-Zuniga R, Diez-Tejedor E. It’s time to say goodbye to the ESUS construct. Front Neurol. 2020;11:653. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00653.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
• Spence JD. The need for clinical judgement in the application of evidence-based medicine. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111300. This paper discusses the importance of clinical judgement in applying the results of clinical trials to individual patients, and the hazards of relying on flawed trials.
Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, Stankunavicius R, Kolettis GJ. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1371–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198705283162204.
Bogiatzi C, Wannarong T, McLeod AI, Heisel M, Hackam D, Spence JD. SPARKLE (Subtypes of Ischaemic Stroke Classification System), incorporating measurement of carotid plaque burden: a new validated tool for the classification of ischemic stroke subtypes. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(4):243–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362417.
Spence JD, Eliasziw M, DiCicco M, Hackam DG, Galil R, Lohmann T. Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2916–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000042207.16156.b9.
• Zhang H, Li Z, Dai Y, Guo E, Zhang C, Wang Y. Ischaemic stroke etiological classification system: the agreement analysis of CISS, SPARKLE and TOAST. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019;4(3):123–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000226. This study reports that the CISS and SPARKLE stroke subtype classifications that include plaque burden in the definition of Large Artery Atherosclerosis (LAA) identify more LAA and fewer ESUS cases.
Gao S, Wang YJ, Xu AD, Li YS, Wang DZ. Chinese ischemic stroke subclassification. Front Neurol. 2011;2:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2011.00006.
Kamel H, Merkler AE, Iadecola C, Gupta A, Navi BB. Tailoring the approach to embolic stroke of undetermined source: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(7):855–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0591.
•• Kamel H, Navi BB, Merkler AE, Baradaran H, Diaz I, Parikh NS, et al. Reclassification of ischemic stroke etiological subtypes on the basis of high-risk nonstenosing carotid plaque. Stroke. 2020;51(2):504–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027970. This study reports that identifying high-risk plaque by MRI results in reclassification of stroke subtypes, with ESUS patients being reclassified as LAA, and others being classified as multiple causes.
•• Kopczak A, Schindler A, Bayer-Karpinska A, Koch ML, Sepp D, Zeller J, et al. Complicated carotid artery plaques as a cause of cryptogenic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(19):2212–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.532. This study reports that identifying high-risk plaque by MRI results in reclassification of stroke subtypes, with ESUS patients being reclassified as LAA, and others being classified as multiple causes.
• Spence JD. Anticoagulation in patients with embolic stroke of unknown source. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(4):334–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493019826363. This paper presents the rationale for anticoagulating patients in whom a cardioembolic source is strongly suspected.
Ozdemir AO, Tamayo A, Munoz C, Dias B, Spence JD. Cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: clinical clues to paradoxical embolism. J Neurol Sci. 2008;275(1–2):121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2008.08.018.
Ozdemir O, Beletsky V, Hachinski V, Spence JD. Cerebrovascular events on awakening, patent foramen ovale and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 2008;268(1–2):193–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.11.010.
Weitz JI, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Bauersachs R, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bounameaux H, et al. Rivaroxaban or aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(13):1211–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700518.
Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, Diener HC, Hart R, Golitsyn S, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):806–17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1007432.
Deykin D. Thrombogenesis. N Engl J Med. 1967;276(11):622–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196703162761107.
Caplan LR, Fisher M. The endothelium, platelets, and brain ischemia. Rev Neurol Dis. 2007;4(3):113–21.
Connolly SJ, Eikelboom JW, Ng J, Hirsh J, Yusuf S, Pogue J, et al. Net clinical benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom vitamin K antagonists are unsuitable. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(9):579–86. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-9-201111010-00004.
Lilja JJ, Neuvonen M, Neuvonen PJ. Effects of regular consumption of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58(1):56–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02095.x.
Lilja JJ, Kivisto KT, Neuvonen PJ. Grapefruit juice increases serum concentrations of atorvastatin and has no effect on pravastatin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66(2):118–27. https://doi.org/10.1053/cp.1999.v66.100453001.
Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom JW, et al. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(4):321–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.104.
Vrijens B, Heidbuchel H. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: considerations on once- vs. twice-daily regimens and their potential impact on medication adherence. Europace. 2015;17(4):514–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu311.
• Bonaca MP, Bauersachs RM, Anand SS, Debus ES, Nehler MR, Patel MR, et al. Rivaroxaban in peripheral artery disease after revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000052. This paper shows that rivaroxaban is now taken twice daily.
•• Ray WA, Chung CP, Stein CM, Smalley W, Zimmerman E, Dupont WD, et al. Association of rivaroxaban vs apixaban with major ischemic or hemorrhagic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2021;326(23):2395–404. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.21222. This study reports that apixaban reduces more cardiovascular events and causes less bleeding than rivaroxaban.
•• Fralick M, Colacci M, Schneeweiss S, Huybrechts KF, Lin KJ, Gagne JJ. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation in routine practice: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-2522. This study reports that apixaban reduces more cardiovascular events and causes less bleeding than rivaroxaban.
•• Zhou M, Azarpazhooh MR, Spence JD, Hashem S, Ma W, Cheng X, et al. Deep learning-based carotid plaque segmentation from B-mode ultrasound images. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2021;online June 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.05.023. This study reports a new highly reproducible and fast automated method for measuring carotid plaque burden, that will make it easier to add plaque burden to the definition of Large Artery Atherosclerosis.
•• Zhou R, Guo F, Azarpazhooh MR, Hashemi S, Cheng X, Spence JD, et al. Deep learning-based measurement of total plaque area in B-mode ultrasound images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021;25(8):2967–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2021.3060163. This study reports a new highly reproducible and fast automated method for measuring carotid plaque burden that will make it easier to add plaque burden to the definition of large artery atherosclerosis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author does not have an existing conflict of Interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Stroke.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spence, J.D. Management of Patients with Embolic Stroke of Unknown Source: Interpreting the Evidence in the Light of Clinical Judgement. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 22, 389–393 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01202-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-022-01202-w