Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical Options for End-Stage Achalasia

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Achalasia is one of the most commonly described primary esophageal motility disorders worldwide, but there is significant controversy regarding ideal management of end-stage disease. This article reviews the definition of end-stage achalasia and summarizes past and present surgical treatment.

Recent Findings: Myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter remains the mainstay of treatment of achalasia, even in advanced disease. Esophagectomy may have benefit as a primary treatment modality in end-stage achalasia with sigmoid esophagus, but international guidelines recommend consideration of laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches initially in most patients. Novel peroral esophageal plication techniques may provide alternative treatment options in patients with significant esophageal dilation that fail myotomy or esophagectomy.

Summary: End-stage achalasia is characterized by progressive tortuosity and dilation of the esophagus as a failure of primary peristalsis. Up to 20% of patients with achalasia will progress to end-stage disease. In most cases, laparoscopic or endoscopic myotomy is recommended as initial approach to surgical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mundre P, Black CJ, Mohammed N, Ford AC. Efficacy of surgical or endoscopic treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(1):30–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Csendes A, Smok G, Braghetto I, et al. Histological studies of Auerbach’s plexuses of the oesophagus, stomach, jejunum, and colon in patients with achalasia of the oesophagus: correlation with gastric acid secretion, presence of parietal cells and gastric emptying of solids. Gut. 1992;33:150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kundu NR, Thompson SK. (2020). Esophagectomy for end-stage achalasia: s it too aggressive? annals of esophagus, 3, [23].

  4. Peters JH, Kauer WKH, Crookes PF, Ireland AP, Brenner CG, DeMeester TR. Esophageal resection with colon interposition for end-stage achalasia. Arch Surg. 1995;130:632–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy071.

  6. Ellis FG, Banbury MK, Rice TW, Goldblum JR et al. Esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for achalasia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:1077-84.

  7. Menezes MA, Andolfi C, Herbella FA, Patti MG. High resolution manometry findings in patients with achalasia and massive dilated megaesophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30:1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japan Esophageal Society. Descriptive rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus, June 2012: 4th Edition. Esophagus. 2017;14(4):275–89. Provides objective characterization of esophageal disease that may better clarify future discussion around the classification of end-stage and sigmoid esophagus.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sweet MP, Nipomnick I, Gasper WJ, et al. The outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia is not influenced by the degree of esophageal dilatation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(1):159–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu S, Chai N, Zhai Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Linghu E. Advanced achalasia: good candidate for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34(3):doaa097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbella FA, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication in patients with end-stage achalasia. World J Surg. 2015;39(7):1631–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehman MB, Clark SB, Ormsby AH, Rice TW, Richter JE, Goldblum JR. Squamous mucosal alterations in esophagectomy specimens from patients with end-stage achalasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(11):1413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark SB, Rice TW, Tubbs RR, Richter JE, Goldblum JR. The nature of the myenteric infiltrate in achalasia: an immuno- histochemical analysis. Ann J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pajecki D, Zilberstein B, dos Santos MA, et al. Megaesophagus microbiota: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(5):723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. **Csendes Juhasz A, González Arestizábal T, Lanzarini Sobrevia E. Management of End-Stage Achalasia. Foregut. 2022;2(4):409–422. A comprehensive review of current surgical techniques with available corresponding figures that summarizes multiple small series in the treatment of end-stage achalasia.

  16. Gockel I, Timm S, Sgourakis GG, Musholt TJ, Rink AD, Lang H. Achalasia–if surgical treatment fails: analysis of remedial surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(Suppl 1):46–S57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duranceau A, Liberman M, Martin J, Ferraro P. End-stage achalasia. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(4):319–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iqbal A, Tierney B, Haider M, Salinas V, Karu A, Turaga K, Mittal S, Filipi C. Laparoscopic re-operation for failed Heller myotomy. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(3):193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckardt VF, Aignherr C, Bernhard G. Predictors of out- come in patients with achalasia treated by pneumatic dila- tion. Gastroenterology. 1992;103(6):1732–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shemmeri E, Louie BE, Katz PO. Outcome measures for Achalasia: beyond the Eckardt score. Foregut. 2022;2(4):402–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith KE, Saad AR, Hanna JP, et al. Revisional surgery in patients with recurrent Dysphagia after Heller Myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(5):991–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller Myotomy results in worse outcomes than Heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006;243(5):579–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Portale G, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, Guirroli E, Ceolin M, Salvador R, Ancona E, Zaninotto G. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Heller–Dor surgery for esophageal achalasia: possible detrimental role of previous endoscopic treatment. J Gastro- intest Surg. 2005;9(9):1332–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torquati A, Richards WO, Holzman MD, Sharp KW. Laparo- scopic myotomy for achalasia: predictors of successful outcome after 200 cases. Ann Surg. 2006;243:587–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Arain MA, Peters JH, Tambankar AP, Portale G, Almogy G, DeMeester SR, Crookes PF, Hagan JA, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR. Pre-operative lower esophageal sphincter pressure affects outcome of laparoscopic esophageal myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(3):328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weir WB, Chang AC. Reintervention for Achalasia: a review of the literature. Foregut. 2022;2(3):287–92. A succinct summary of the current literature regarding reintervention for achalasia, much of which has applications when considering treatment of end-stage disease.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan S, Zhong C, Ren Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia patients with failed previous intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut Liver. 2021;15(2):153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schuchert MJ, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ, et al. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of sigmoidal esophagus in achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(6):1029–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Molena D, Mungo B, Stem M, Feinberg RL, Lidor AO. Outcomes of esophagectomy for esophageal achalasia in the United States. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(2):310–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glatz SM, Richardson JD. Esophagectomy for end stage achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(9):1134–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fisichella PM, Patti MG. From Heller to POEM (1914–2014): a 100-year history of surgery for Achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(10):1870–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Griffiths EA, Devitt PG, Jamieson GG, et al. Laparoscopic stapled cardioplasty for end-stage achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:997–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hamer PW, Griffiths EA, Devitt PG, et al. Laparoscopic stapled cardioplasty-room for improvement. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1078–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fekete F, Breil P, Tossen JC. Reoperation after Heller’s operation for achalasia and other motility disorders of the esophagus: a study of eighty-one reoperations. Int Surg. 1982;67:103–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tassi V, Lugaresi M, Mattioli B, et al. Quality of Life after Operation for End-Stage Achalasia: pull-down Heller-Dor Versus Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;113(1):271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. *Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Basha J, Goud R, Darisetty S, Reddy DN. Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in Sigmoid and Advanced Sigmoid Achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(2):530–2. Objective outlook on endoscopic myotomy in end-stage achalasia, including the technical challenges.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J, et al. Endoscopic or Surgical Myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(23):2219–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peters JH. An antireflux procedure is critical to the long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;5(1):17–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Torres-Landa S, Crafts TD, Jones AE, Dewey EN, Wood SG. Surgical Outcomes after Esophagectomy in patients with Achalasia: a NSQIP Matched Analysis with Non-Achalasia Esophagectomy Patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(10):2455–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208(4):460–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. DeMeester SR. Colonic Interposition for Benign Disease. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006;11(3):232–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dessanti A, Falchetti D, Di Benedetto V, Scuderi MG. Pedicled jejunal interposition as esophageal substitute in pediatric patients. Technical considerations and long - term results. J Ped Surg Case Reports. 2021;64:101744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gaur P, Blackmon SH. Jejunal graft conduits after esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(Suppl 3):333–S340.

    Google Scholar 

  44. *Hedberg HM, Attaar M, McCormack MS, Ujiki MB. Per-Oral Plication of (Neo)Esophagus: Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes [published online ahead of print, 2023 Apr 13]. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;1–8. This describes a novel technique in reducing redundancy of the sigmoid esophagus and may provide useful applications in salvage after surgical treatment.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foregut Surgery, Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, OR, 97,213, Portland, Oregon, USA

    Melissa DeSouza

Authors
  1. Melissa DeSouza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Primary author wroth the manuscript text, prepared tables, and reviewed he final manuscript. No additional authors participated in the writing or reviewing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa DeSouza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeSouza, M. Surgical Options for End-Stage Achalasia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 25, 267–274 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00889-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00889-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation