Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization design of anti-seismic engineering measures for intake tower based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-rise intake towers in high-intensity seismic areas are prone to structural safety problems under vibration. Therefore, effective and low-cost anti-seismic engineering measures must be designed for protection. An intake tower in northwest China was considered the research object, and its natural vibration characteristics and dynamic response were first analyzed using the mode decomposition response spectrum method based on a three-dimensional finite element model. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) was adopted to optimize the anti-seismic scheme combination by comprehensively considering the dynamic tower response and variable project cost. Finally, the rationality of the original intake tower antiseismic design scheme was evaluated according to the obtained optimal solution set, and recommendations for improvement were proposed. The method adopted in this study may provide significant references for designing anti-seismic measures for high-rise structures such as intake towers located in high-intensity earthquake areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang H Y, Li T C, Li Z K. Modeling in SolidWorks and analysis of temperature and thermal stress during construction of intake tower. Water Science and Engineering, 2009, 2(1): 95–102

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gong C L, Liu H, Zhang J. Study on dynamic properties of the intake tower with finite element method. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 501–504: 1888–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Y, Lin Z T, Song C, Dong B Y. Seismic analysis of a water release integrated structure part I: Response spectrum analysis of intake tower. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 470: 938–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan Y Z, Xiong C X, Wen X H, Li W H. Structure seismic analysis on intake tower of spillway tunnel. Advanced Materials Research, 2015, 1065–1069: 1427–1432

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alembagheri M. Earthquake response of solitary slender freestanding intake towers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 90: 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang H Y, Zhang L J. Tuned mass damper system of high-rise intake towers optimized by improved harmony search algorithm. Engineering Structures, 2017, 138: 270–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartoli G, Betti M, Galano L, Zini G. Numerical insights on the seismic risk of confined masonry towers. Engineering Structures, 2019, 180: 713–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zou X K, Chan C M. An optimal resizing technique for seismic drift design of concrete buildings subjected to response spectrum and time history loadings. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(19): 1689–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ftima M, Léger P. Seismic stability of cracked concrete dams using rigid block models. Computers & Structures, 2006, 84(28): 1802–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorai S, Mait D. Seismic response of concrete gravity dams under near field and far field ground motions. Engineering Structures, 2019, 196: 109292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aldemir A. Prediction equation for the fundamental vibration period of concrete gravity dams with impounded water. Earthquake Spectra, 2021, 37(3): 1710–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. GB 51247-2018. Standard for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2018 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Y, Li S Y, Xia K, Guo J J, He G J, Li M. Seismic study on backfill height of tower-back for high-rise intake tower structure. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2018, 49(11): 62–67 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang G, Li S Y, Li L, Xiao Y, Zhang Z X, Yang Y. Effect of backfill height on seismic performance of high intake tower. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2019, 30: 6 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang W J, Lu W B, Chen M, Yan P, Zhou C B. Analysis of consolidation grouting effect of rock mass based on comparison of wave velocity before and after grouting. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics & Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 469–478 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ang H, Lee J. Cost optimal design of R/C buildings. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001, 73(3): 233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esteva L, Díaz-Löpez O, García-Pérez J. Life-cycle optimization in the establishment of performance-acceptance parameters for seismic design. Structural Safety, 2002, 24: 187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng P, Hobbs B, Koonce J. Optimizing multiple dam removals under multiple objectives: Linking tributary habitat and the Lake Erie ecosystem. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(12): 1699–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lozano M, Ramos J, Serra L. Cost optimization of the design of CHCP (combined heat, cooling and power) systems under legal constraints. Energy, 2010, 35(2): 794–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong D H, Li Z, Wu B P, Hu W, Lü P. Time-quality-cost tradeoff optimization of rockfill dam construction based on pareto solution. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2016, 49(10): 1001–1007

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bu K Z, Zhao Y, Zheng X C. Optimization design for foundation pit above metro tunnel based on NSGA2 genetic algorithm. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 459–467 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang W B, Shi D D, Shen Z Z, Wang X H, Gan L, Shao W, Tang P, Zhang H W, Yu S Y. Effect of calcium leaching on the fracture properties of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2023, 365: 130018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang W B, Shi D D, Shen Z Z, Shao W, Gan L, Yuan Y, Tang P, Zhao S, Chen Y S. Reduction of the calcium leaching effect on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete by adding chopped basalt fibers. Construction & Building Materials, 2023, 365: 130080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chao Z M, Dang Y B, Pan Y, Wang F Y, Wang M, Zhang J, Yang C X. Prediction of the shale gas permeability: A data mining approach. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 2023, 33: 100435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang L, Chang F. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for operating parallel reservoir system. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 377(1–2): 12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zare O, Saghafian B, Shamsai A, Nazif S. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms for qualitative and quantitative control of urban runoff. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2012, 9: 777–817

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S P, Zhao D M, Yuan J Z, Li H J, Gao Y. Application of NSGA-II algorithm for fault diagnosis in power system. Electric Power Systems Research, 2019, 175: 105893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghasemi H, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Rabczuk T. Uncertainties propagation in metamodel-based probabilistic optimization of CNT/polymer composite structure using stochastic multi-scale modeling. Computational Materials Science, 2014, 85: 295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghasemi H, Brighenti R, Zhuang X, Muthu J, Rabczuk T. Optimal fiber content and distribution in fiber-reinforced solids using a reliability and NURBS based sequential optimization approach. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(1): 99–112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. GB 18306-2015. Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China. Beijing: China Earthquake Administration, 2015 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  31. SL 744-2016. Specification for Load Design of Hydraulic Structures. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2016 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goyal A, Chopra A K. Hydrodynamic and foundation interaction effects in dynamics of intake towers: Earthquake responses. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989, 115(6): 1386–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goyal A, Chopra A K. Earthquake analysis of intake-outlet towers including tower-water-foundation-soil interaction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1989, 18(3): 325–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Miranda E, Bertero V V. Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design. Earthquake Spectra, 1994, 10(2): 357–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Deb K. Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and construction of test problems. Evolutionary Computation, 1999, 7(3): 205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ye C J, Huang M X. Multi-objective optimal power flow considering transient stability based on parallel NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2015, 30(2): 857–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu D, Huang Q, Yang Y Y, Liu D F, Wei X T. Bi-objective algorithm based on NSGA-II framework to optimize reservoirs operation. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 585: 124830

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of the China/Yalong River Joint Fund Project (No. U1765205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenzhong Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, J., Shen, Z., Huang, Z. et al. Optimization design of anti-seismic engineering measures for intake tower based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 1428–1441 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0998-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-023-0998-2

Keywords

Navigation