Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of forearm muscles with ultrasound shear wave elastography in patients with acromegaly

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 3 Altmetric

Abstract

Purpose

The effects of acromegaly on soft tissues, bones and joints are well-documented, but information on its effects on muscle mass and quality remains limited. The primary goal of this study is to assess the sonoelastographic features of forearm muscles in patients with acromegaly.

Method

Forty-five patients with acromegaly and 45 healthy controls similar in terms of gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were included in a single-center, multidisciplinary, cross-sectional study. The body composition was analyzed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and height-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle index (hSMI) was calculated. The dominant hand’s grip strength was also measured. Two radiologists specialized in the musculoskeletal system employed ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) to assess the thickness and stiffness of brachioradialis and biceps brachii muscles.

Results

The acromegaly group had significantly higher thickness of both the biceps brachii (p = 0.034) and brachioradialis muscle (p = 0.046) than the control group. However, the stiffness of the biceps brachii (p = 0.001) and brachioradialis muscle (p = 0.001) was lower in the acromegaly group than in the control group. Disease activity has not caused a significant difference in muscle thickness and stiffness in the acromegaly group (p > 0.05). The acromegaly group had a higher hSMI (p = 0.004) than the control group. The hand grip strength was similar between the acromegaly and control group (p = 0.594).

Conclusion

The patients with acromegaly have an increased muscle thickness but decreased muscle stiffness in the forearm muscles responsible for elbow flexion. Acromegaly can lead to a permanent deterioration of the muscular structure regardless of the disease activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this research are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Katznelson L, Laws ER, Melmed S et al (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gadelha MR, Kasuki L, Lim DST, Fleseriu M (2018) Systemic complications of acromegaly and the impact of the current treatment landscape: an update. Endocr Rev 40(1):268–332. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giustina A, Barkan A, Beckers A et al (2020) A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(4):E937–E946. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgz096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller A, Doll H, David J, Wass J (2008) Impact of musculoskeletal disease on quality of life in long-standing acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 158(5):587–593. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-07-0838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martel-Duguech L, Alonso-Pérez J, Bascuñana H et al (2021) Intramuscular fatty infiltration and physical function in controlled acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 185(1):167–177. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML et al (2015) WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol 41(5):1126–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Creze M, Nordez A, Soubeyrand M, Rocher L, Maître X, Bellin MF (2018) Shear wave sonoelastography of skeletal muscle: basic principles, biomechanical concepts, clinical applications, and future perspectives. Skeletal Radiol 47(4):457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2843-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phan A, Lee J, Gao J (2019) Ultrasound shear wave elastography in assessment of skeletal muscle stiffness in senior volunteers. Clin Imaging 58:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW et al (2017) Shear-wave elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics 37(3):855–870. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bastijns S, De Cock AM, Vandewoude M, Perkisas S (2020) Usability and pitfalls of Shear-Wave Elastography for evaluation of muscle quality and its potential in assessing Sarcopenia: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 46(11):2891–2907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.06.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scacchi M, Andrioli M, Carzaniga C et al (2009) Elastosonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules in acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 161(4):607–613. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-09-0558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burulday V, Doğan A, Şahan MH, Arıkan Ş, Güngüneş A (2018) Ultrasound elastography of the median nerve in patients with acromegaly: a case-control study. J Ultrasound Med 37(10):2371–2377. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karataş A, Artaş H, Uğur K, Koca SS (2022) Sonoelastrographic finding of Achilles tendon in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and acromegaly. Diagn Interv Radiol (Ankara Turkey) 9(3):122–125. https://doi.org/10.5152/eujrheum.2022.21132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bankir M, Sumbul HE, Koc AS, Demirtas D, Acibucu F (2019) Elastography detected solid organ stiffness increased in patients with acromegaly. Med (United States) 98(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014212

  15. Kleiber T, Kunz L, Disselhorst-Klug C (2015) Muscular coordination of biceps brachii and brachioradialis in elbow flexion with respect to hand position. Front Physiol 6(Aug):139652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mercado M, Abreu C, Vergara-López A et al (2020) Surgical and pharmacological outcomes in acromegaly: real-life data from the mexican acromegaly registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(12). https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa664

  17. Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM (2011) Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-115

  18. Landin D, Thompson M, Jackson MR (2017) Actions of the Biceps Brachii at the shoulder: a review. J Clin Med Res 9(8):667–670. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2901w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lung BE, Bisogno M (2019) Anatomy, shoulder and Upper Limb, Forearm Brachioradialis muscle. StatPearls Publishing

  20. Kim KM, Jang HC, Lim S (2016) Differences among skeletal muscle mass indices derived from height-, weight-, and body mass index-adjusted models in assessing sarcopenia. Korean J Intern Med 31(4):643–650. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S et al (2015) Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. The Lancet 386(9990):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ibrahim K, May C, Patel HP, Baxter M, Sayer AA, Roberts H (2016) A feasibility study of implementing grip strength measurement into routine hospital practice (GRImP): study protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0067-x

  23. Unal I (2017) Defining an optimal cut-point value in ROC analysis: An alternative approach. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. ;2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3762651

  24. Roberts TJ (2016) Contribution of elastic tissues to the mechanics and energetics of muscle function during movement. J Exp Biol 219(2):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.124446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alfuraih AM, O’Connor P, Tan AL et al (2019) Muscle shear wave elastography in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a case–control study with MRI correlation. Skeletal Radiol 48(8):1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03175-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagert E, Lluch A, Rein S (2016) The role of proprioception and neuromuscular stability in carpal instabilities. J Hand Surgery: Eur Volume 41(1):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415590390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. He X, Huang WY, Leong HT et al (2021) Decreased passive muscle stiffness of vastus medialis is associated with poorer quadriceps strength and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech Elsevier Ltd 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105289

  28. Ozturk Gokce B, Gogus F, Bolayir B et al (2020) The evaluation of the tendon and muscle changes of lower extremity in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary 23(4):338–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-020-01037-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Onal ED, Ipek A, Evranos B, Idilman IS, Cakir B, Ersoy R (2016) Structural tendon changes in patients with acromegaly: Assessment of Achilles tendon with sonoelastography. Med Ultrasonography 18(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.181.edo

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiwana MS, Charlick M, Varacallo M (2022) Anatomy, shoulder and Upper Limb, biceps muscle. StatPearls Publishing

  31. Nagulesparen M, Trickey R, Davies MJ, Jenkins JS (1976) Muscle changes in acromegaly. BMJ 2(6041):914–915. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6041.914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Arlien-Søborg MC, Dal J, Madsen MA et al (2023) Whole-body and forearm muscle protein metabolism in patients with acromegaly before and after treatment. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. Published online April 10, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad190

  33. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R (2000) Estimation of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Appl Physiol 89(2):465–471. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lopes AA, Albuquerque L, Fontes M, Rego D, Bandeira F (2022) Body composition in Acromegaly according to Disease activity – performance of dual X-Ray Absorptiometry and Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis. Front Endocrinol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.866099

  35. Fernandez AM, LeRoith D (2005) Skeletal muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol 567:117–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26274-1_5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katznelson L (2009) Alterations in body composition in acromegaly. Pituitary 12(2):136–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-008-0104-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jorgensen JOL, Thuesen L, Muller J, Ovesen P, Skakkebaek NE, Christiansen JS (1994) Three years of growth hormone treatment in growth hormone-deficient adults: Near normalization of body composition and physical performance. Eur J Endocrinol 130(3):224–228. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1300224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. BRUMMER R -J M, LÖNNS L, KVIST H, GRANGÅRD U, ‐A BENGTSSONB (1993) Adipose tissue and muscle volume determination by computed tomography in acromegaly, before and I year after adenomectomy. Eur J Clin Invest 23(4):199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.1993.tb00762.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Guo X, Gao L, Shi X et al (2018) Pre- and Postoperative Body Composition and Metabolic Characteristics in Patients with Acromegaly: A Prospective Study. International Journal of Endocrinology. ;2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4125013

  40. Füchtbauer L, Olsson DS, Bengtsson BA, Norrman LL, Sunnerhagen KS, Johannsson G (2017) Muscle strength in patients with acromegaly at diagnosis and during long-term follow-up. Eur J Endocrinol 177(2):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Nurse Selma Avcu and Health Technician Semra Aydogan, who provided body composition analysis and hand grip strength measurements in.

the study group. We thank all the participants in the study.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. M.C., H.N.S., M.N.C., A.B., E.T.C., M.M.Y., A.E.A., M.A., M.A.K., and F.B.T. have performed material preparation, data collection and analysis. M.C., F.B.T. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors commented on previous versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meric Coskun.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The local ethics committee approved this study. Participants were informed about the study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coskun, M., Sendur, H.N., Cerit, M.N. et al. Assessment of forearm muscles with ultrasound shear wave elastography in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary 26, 716–724 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01352-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01352-1

Keywords

Navigation