Skip to main content
Log in

The Power Law in Operating Room Management

  • Systems-Level Quality Improvement
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Acute Care Surgery model has been implemented by many hospitals in the United States. As complex adaptive systems, healthcare systems are composed of many interacting elements that respond to intrinsic and extrinsic inputs. Systems level analysis may reveal the underlying organizational structure of tactical block allocations like the Acute Care Surgery model. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate one method to identify a key characteristic of complex adaptive systems in the perioperative services. Start and end times for all surgeries performed at the University of Vermont Medical Center OR1 were extracted for two years prior to the transition to an Acute Care Surgery service and two years following the transition. Histograms were plotted for the inter-event times calculated from the difference between surgical cases. A power law distribution was fit to the post-transition histogram. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for goodness-of-fit at 95% level of significance shows the histogram plotted from post-transition inter-event times follows a power law distribution (K-S = 0.088, p = 0.068), indicating a Complex Adaptive System. Our analysis demonstrates that the strategic decision to create an Acute Care Surgery service has direct implications on tactical and operational processes in the perioperative services. Elements of complex adaptive systems can be represented by a power law distributions and similar methods may be applied to identify other processes that operate as complex adaptive systems in perioperative care. To make sustained improvements in the perioperative services, focus on manufacturing-based interventions such as Lean Six Sigma should instead be shifted towards the complex interventions that modify system-specific behaviors described by complex adaptive system principles when power law relationships are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan J, Wen HJ, Awad N. Health care and services delivery systems as complex adaptive systems. Commun ACM. 2005;48(5):36-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. Complexity science: The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):625-628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;336(7656):1281-1283.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fath BD, Fiscus DA, Goerner SJ, Berea A, Ulanowicz RE. Measuring regenerative economics: 10 principles and measures undergirding systemic economic health. Glob Transit. 2019;1:15-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiviliene J, Blazeviciene A. Review of complex adaptive systems in nursing practice. Journal of Complexity in Health Sciences. 2019;2(2):46-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nugus P, Carroll K, Hewett DG, Short A, Forero R, Braithwaite J. Integrated care in the emergency department: a complex adaptive systems perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(11):1997-2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. deMattos PC, Miller DM, Park EH. Decision making in trauma centers from the standpoint of complex adaptive systems. Manag Decis. 2012;50(9):1549-1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawe P. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:307-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahajan A, Islam SD, Schwartz MJ, Cannesson M. A Hospital Is Not Just a Factory, but a Complex Adaptive System—Implications for Perioperative Care. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):333-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopes AM, Machado JAT. Power Law Behaviour in Complex Systems. Entropy (Basel). 2018;20(9):671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon HA. On a Class of Skew Distribution Functions. Biometrika. 1955; 42(3/4):425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smethurst DP, Williams HC. Power laws. Are hospital waiting lists self-regulating?. Nature. 2001;410(6829):652–653.

  13. Burton C, Elliott A, Cochran A, Love T. Do healthcare services behave as complex systems? Analysis of patterns of attendance and implications for service delivery. BMC Med 2018; 16(1).

  14. Tanner-Smith EE, Grant S. Meta-Analysis of Complex Interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:135-151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins CE, Pringle PL, Santry HP. Innovation or rebranding, acute care surgery diffusion will continue. Journal of Surgical Research. 2015;197(2):354-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. The acute surgical unit model verses the traditional "on call" model: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1381-1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anantha R, Paskar D, Vogt K, Crawford S, Parry N, Leslie K. Allocating operating room resources to an acute care surgery service does not affect wait-times for elective cancer surgeries: a retrospective cohort study. World J Emerg Surg. 2014;9(1):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paine AN, Krompf BL, Borrazzo EC, et al. The Impact of an Acute Care Surgery Model on General Surgery Service Productivity. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2018;12:26-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paine AN, Andritsos DA, Fitzgerald JR, Norotsky MC, Malhotra AK, Tsai MH. The operational impact of an acute care surgical service on operating room metrics. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2017;8:38-41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman ME. Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review. 2009;51(4):661-703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. de Koning H, Verver JP, van den Heuvel J, Bisgaard S, Does RJ. Lean six sigma in healthcare. J Healthc Qual. 2006;28(2):4-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson ST, Kirsch JR. Lean Strategies in the Operating Room. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015;33(4):713-730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, et al. Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):83-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DelliFraine JL, Langabeer JR 2nd, Nembhard IM. Assessing the evidence of Six Sigma and Lean in the health care industry. Qual Manag Health Care. 2010;19(3):211-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts RJ, Wilson AE, Quezado Z. Using Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Improve Quality of the Anesthesia Supply Chain in a Pediatric Hospital. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(3):922-924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ammanuel SG, Chan AK, DiGiorgio AM, et al. Perioperative Anesthesia Lean Implementation Is Associated With Increased Operative Efficiency in Posterior Cervical Surgeries at a High Volume Spine Center. Neurospine. 2020;17(2):390-397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickson EW, Singh S, Cheung DS, Wyatt CC, Nugent AS. Application of lean manufacturing techniques in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2009;37(2):177-182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciulla TA, Tatikonda MV, ElMaraghi YA, et al. LEAN SIX SIGMA TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINIC EFFICIENCY. Retina. 2018;38(9):1688-1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Collar RM, Shuman AG, Feiner S, et al. Lean management in academic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(6):928-936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A. The use of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review. Surgeon. 2015;13(2):91-100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rothstein DH, Raval MV. Operating room efficiency. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(2):79-85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huynh TT, Paiste J, Black IH. The Perioperative Surgical Home: High-reliability or Ultra-safe Organization? Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;57(1):32-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leslie M, Hagood C, Royer A, Reece CP Jr, Maloney S. Using lean methods to improve OR turnover times. AORN J. 2006;84(5):849-855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tagge EP, Thirumoorthi AS, Lenart J, Garberoglio C, Mitchell KW. Improving operating room efficiency in academic children's hospital using Lean Six Sigma methodology. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(6):1040-1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spear SJ, Bowen HK. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harv Bus Rev. 1999;77(5):96-106.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spear SJ. Learning to lead at Toyota. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82(5):78-151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Teich ST, Faddoul FF. Lean management-the journey from toyota to healthcare. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2013;4(2):e0007.

  38. Fairbanks CB. Using Six Sigma and Lean methodologies to improve OR throughput. AORN J. 2007;86(1):73-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lipsitz LA. Understanding Health Care as a Complex System. JAMA. 2012; 308(3):243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Partial support provided by Vermont EPSCoR, with funds from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant OIA-1556770, is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Timothy Wong helped design the study, prepare the manuscript, and provided critical edits. Erik J. Zhang: This author helped prepare the manuscript. Andrea J. Elhajj: The author helped design the study, analyze the data, and provided critical edits manuscript. Donna M. Rizzo: The author helped analyze the data and provided critical edits. Kevin Sexton helped prepare the manuscript and provided critical edits. Jaideep Pandit provided critical edits. Mitchell H. Tsai: The author helped design the study, prepare and manuscript and provide critical edits. He is the corresponding and archival author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell H. Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Summary statement

Operating room management strategies require unique adaptations suited to complex adaptive systems, which may be identified by the presence of a power law relationship.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no personal conflicts of interest and have received no outside support for the creation of this document.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, T., Zhang, E.J., Elhajj, A.J. et al. The Power Law in Operating Room Management. J Med Syst 45, 92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01764-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01764-1

Keywords

Navigation