Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of approaches to identify live births using the medicaid analytic extract

  • Published:
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medicaid claims are an important, but underutilized source of data for neonatal health services research in the United States. However, identifying live births in Medicaid claims data is challenging due to variation in coding practices by state and year. Methods of identifying live births in Medicaid claims data have not been validated, and it is not known which methods are most appropriate for different research questions. The objective of this study is to describe and validate five approaches to identifying births using Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) from 45 states (2006–2014). We calculated total number of MAX births by state-year using five definitions: (1) any claim within 30 days of birth date listed in personal summary (PS) file, (2) any claim within 7 days of PS birth date, (3) live birth ICD-9 in inpatient or other therapies file, (4) live birth ICD-9 code in inpatient file, (5) live birth ICD-9 in inpatient file with matching PS birth date. We then compared the number of MAX births by state and year to expected counts using outside data sources. Definition 1 identified the most births (14,189,870) and was closest to total expected count (98.3%). Each definition produced over- and underestimates compared to expected counts for given state-years. Findings suggest that the broadest definition of live births (Definition 1) was closest to expected counts, but that the most appropriate definition depends on research question and state-years of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) Data is available for purchase through the Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC). Medicaid enrollment data is publicly available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Original data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), the Kaiser Family Foundation, and March of Dimes are publicly available and derived state-year estimates from this data are included in supplementary material.

Code availability

SAS code is available from the authors upon request.

References

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under award number R21DA045212 (Faherty). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study design, interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the manuscript. AK acquired the data and SH analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara E. Heins.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heins, S.E., Faherty, L.J. & Kranz, A.M. A comparison of approaches to identify live births using the medicaid analytic extract. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 22, 49–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-021-00252-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-021-00252-w

Keywords

Navigation