Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social Media Jurors: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Online Public Engagement in reference to Legal Cases

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jurors are people who are exposed to legal proceedings and consequently exercise their judgment. A broad literature on law and film discusses the analogy between formal jurors, who are assigned to jury duty by the legal system, and "informal jurors"– "viewers-as-jurors" who encounter the legal system indirectly, through the media. In this paper, we identify a new category of "informal jurors", which refers to public discourse and actions concentrated on social media arenas in reference to legal cases. We argue that this category, which we call "social media jurors", maintains a tight correspondence with existing categories of jurors, but is distinguished from them by their extended abilities for speech and action. This article is based on a netnographic study, by which we illustrate our argument through the online activity in support of Roman Zadorov. Zadorov was convicted of murdering a young girl in Israel, while a large majority of Israelis continue to support his innocence and carry out extensive action on social media in support of this cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data generated or analysed for this study is available upon request.

References

  • Abramson, J. (2000). We, the jury: The jury system and the ideal of democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendel, N. (2018, April 1). The legal adviser to the government is not interested about the reports in the press. Makor Rishon. Retrieved from https://www.makorrishon.co.il/news/33983/

  • Bender, E. (2015, December 24). Poll: 38% of the public believes that Roman Zadorov did not murder Tair Rada. Maariv Online News, Retrieved from http://www.maariv.co.il/

  • Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal, 112, 369–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. B., Robertson, T. J., & Sullivan, L. L. (2012). I see what you did there: The use of social networks to gather evidence. Southern Law Journal, 22, 249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, M., & Maclaran, P. (2001). Body talk: Questioning the assumptions in cognitive age. Psychology & Marketing, 18(10), 1117–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clover, C. J. (1998). Law and the order of popular culture. In A. Sarat & T. R. Kearns (Eds.), Law in the domains of culture (pp. 97–119). University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, C. J. (2000). Judging audiences: The case of the trial movie. In C. Gledhill & L. Williams (Eds.), Reinventing film studies (pp. 244–264). London, UK: Arnold.

  • Goldenberg, A. (2016, April 10). Shadow of trust: The story of collapsing system. The Sting Society and Politics, Retrieved from http://www.haokets.org/2016/04/10/%D7%B4%D7%A6%D7%9C-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%AA%D7%B4%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%A8-%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%9E%D7%A2%D7%A8%D7%9B%D7%95%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%98%D7%98%D7%95%D7%AA

  • Gomez M. G. (2016), Jury trials outside in: Leveraging psychology from discovery to decision. Boulder, CO: National Institute for Trial Advovacy.

  • Goodpaster, G. (1987). On the theory of American adversary criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 78(1), 118–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S., Osborn, G., & Robson, P. (2010). Film and the law: The cinema of justice (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, N. (2019). Just Looking: Justice as seen in Hollywood courtroom Films. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 15(1), 62–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite, C. (2009). Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Heyes R. M., Luther K., (2018), #Crime: Social media, crime and the criminal legal system. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeister T. A. (2014), Social media in the courtroom: A new era for criminal justice? Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAq7cTkX9fk

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, R. (1991). Telling tales in court: Trial procedure and the story model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-On, A. (2012). Communication, community, crisis: Mapping uses and gratifications in the contemporary media environment. New Media and Society, 14(1), 98–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-On, A. (2022). All the truth about the murder of Tair Rada and the Trial of Roman Zadorov: Establishment, justice, citizens and social media. Yedioth Books. (in press)

  • Lev-On, A., & Hardin, R. (2007). Internet-based collaborations and their political significance. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 4(2), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-On, A., & Steinfeld, N. (2020). “Objection, your honor”: Use of social media by civilians to challenge the criminal justice system. Social Science Computer Review, 38(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. & Lev-On, A. (2016). Annual report: The media in Israel 2015: Agendas, uses and trends. Ariel University: the Institute for the Study of New Media, Politics and Society.

  • Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2015). Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Panse, S. (2014). The judging spectator in the image. In S. Panse & D. Rothermel (Eds.), A critique of judgment in film and television (pp. 33–70). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, L., & Dolliver, M. J. (2021). The effect of deliberation on Juror’s attitudes toward jury service in criminal cases. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, E. G. (2014). Taking images seriously. Columbia Law Review, 114(7), 1687–1782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rageh, A., Melewar, T. C., & Woodside, A. G. (2013). Using netnography research method to reveal the underlying dimensions of the customer/tourist experience. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(2), 126–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravad, A., Tsimuki, T., & Yahav, T. (2016, July 27). The clips that led to the conviction of Zadorov in the murder of Tair Rada. Ynet Law and Crime, Retrieved from http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4834035,00.html

  • Sadan, I. (2015, December 30). The AG goes to on a media campaign for its reputation. NRG News, Retrieved from http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/745/536.html

  • Sadan, I. (2016, January 4). The Ministry of Justice presents the truth about the Zadorov trial. NRG News, Retrieved from http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/746/313.html

  • Sarat, A. (1999). The cultural life of capital punishment: Responsibility and representation in “dead man walking” and “last dance.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 11, 153–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A., Douglas, L., & Umphrey, M. M. (2005). On films and law: Broadening the focus. In A. Sarat, L. Douglas, & M. M. Umphrey (Eds.), Law on the screen (pp. 1–26). Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A., Silbey, J., & Umphrey, M. (Eds.). (2019). Trial Films on Trial: Law, Justice and Popular Culture. The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shem-Or, B. (2015, December 23). Why did the Tair Rada murder case become a symbol of loss of faith in the system?. Nana10 Law and Crime, Retrieved from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=1165596

  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, J. M. (2001). Patterns of courtroom justice. Journal of Law in Society, 28, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Justice (2016, July 26). The investigation and conviction of Roman Zadorov. Retrieved fromwww.justice.gov.il/Units/StateAttorney/Publications/Cases/Pages/26-07-16.aspx

  • Truth Today n.d, http://truthtoday.co.il/

  • Tsimuki, T., & Friedson, Y. (2016, April 4). AG: An arrangement on Tair Rada’s murder is a real danger to democracy. Ynet Law and Crime, Retrieved from http://www.maariv.co.il/news/israel/Article-523076

  • Vidmar, N. (2000). A historical and comparative perspective on the common law jury. In N. Vidmar (Ed.), World jury systems (pp. 1–52). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. (2016, April 2). Tair Rada – The supreme court’s media crisis. Ynet Opinions, Retrieved from http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4786112,00.html

  • Zino, A. (2017, April 21). Heart splitting cases. The Attorneys, 34–38.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ariel University, School of Communication, Ariel, Israel

    Nerit Grossman & Azi Lev-On

Authors
  1. Nerit Grossman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Azi Lev-On
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nerit Grossman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grossman, N., Lev-On, A. Social Media Jurors: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Online Public Engagement in reference to Legal Cases. Crime Law Soc Change 79, 223–240 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10047-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10047-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation