Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Defenders at Law: Assessing the performance of legal defense on Drug Trafficking cases in Brazil

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

  • 1 Altmetric

Abstract

Few studies have assessed defense performance in criminal cases in the Latin American context. The current research investigated whether defense type affects the odds of conviction and incarceration length for drug trafficking cases in the Brazilian city of Belo Horizonte. We used a Binary Logistic and a Linear regression model, controlling the results for defendants and case characteristics. From that, we found no difference in the performance of public defenders compared to private and assigned lawyers. Criminal history, firearms seized, and being the only defendant in the process increased incarceration length. Precision scale or plastic bags seizure increased the odds of conviction. Moreover, non-whites and less educated defendants had higher odds of conviction than their counterparts. We attributed these findings to the functioning of the criminal justice system as an assembly line, in which cases are mass treated. In the absence of reflection on the individualities of the processes, court actors end up making decisions based on stereotypes. In the absence of clear criteria in the Drug Law/2006 on who is a user and a dealer, certain social types – perceived as “bandidos” (Misse, Lua Nova 79:15–38, 2010), would be more likely to be labeled as dealers. In this context, the defense can do little to change the process course and its outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, S. (1995). Discriminação racial e justiça criminal em São Paulo. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 43, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar-Aguilar, A. (2021). Gaining Access to Justice: A Subnational Study of the Public Defender’s Office in Mexico. Mexican Law Review, 13(2), 35–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. M., & Heaton, P. (2011). How Much Difference Does the Lawyer Make? The Effect of Defense Counsel on Murder Case Outcomes. RAND Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batitucci, E., Zilli, L., & Couto, V. (2020). Minas Gerais. In J. Sinhoretto (Ed.), Policiamento e relações raciais: Estudo comparado sobre formas contemporâneas de controle do crime (pp. 128–167). Grupo de Estudos sobre Violência e Administração de Conflitos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibas, S. (2013). Shrinking Gideon and expanding alternatives to lawyers. Washington & Lee Law Review, 70, 1287–1308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, A. (1967). The practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational cooptation of a profession. Law & Society Review, 1, 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontrager, S., Barrick, K., & Stupi, E. (2013). Gender and sentencing: A meta-analysis of contemporary research. The Journal of Gender, Race, & Justice, 16, 349–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, M. (2015). Pela metade: As principais implicações da Nova Lei de Drogas no sistema de justiça criminal em São Paulo. Universidade de São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, M. S., & Alvarez, M. C. (2017). Pela metade: Implicações do dispositivo médico-criminal da “nova” Lei de Drogas na cidade de São Paulo. Tempo Social, 29(2), 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, D. J. (1989). Private counsels and public defenders: A look at weak cases, prior records, and leniency in plea bargaining. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. M. (1972). Two models of the criminal justice system: An organizational perspective. Law & Society Review, 7, 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondevilla, G., & Reyes, R. (2016). Is cheaper better? Public and private lawyers before criminal courts in Mexico City. International Journal of Law in Context, 12(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, V. S. (2020). O sistema de justiça juvenil na perspectiva sociológica: Entre frouxa articulação e linha de montagem. Dilemas, 13(3), 781–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Bertomeu, J. F. (2020). Different Ways of Losing: Public Defenders (and Private Counsel) at the Supreme Court of Argentina. Law & Society Review, 54(2), 354–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grillo, C. C., Policarpo, F., & Verissimo, M. A. (2011). A “dura” e o “desenrolo”: Efeitos práticos da nova lei de drogas no Rio de Janeiro. Revista De Sociologia e Política, 19(40), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. D., Miller, H. V., & Spohn, C. (2010). Do you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. B., Rubin, P. H., & Shepherd, J. M. (2005). An empirical study of public defender effectiveness: Self-selection by the marginally indigent. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 223–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K., Chen, K., & Chang-Ching, L. (2010). Does the Type of Criminal Defense Counsel Affect Case Outcomes? A Natural Experiment in Taiwan. International Review of Law and Economics, 30(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INFOPEN. (2016, 2019). Levantamento Nacional de Informações Penitenciárias - INFOPEN [National Prison Information Survey]. Departamento Penitenciário Nacional - DEPEN [National Penitentiary Department].

  • Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Wetterslev, J., & Winkel, P. (2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials: A practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesus, M. (2020). Verdade policial como verdade jurídica: Narrativas do tráfico de drogas no sistema de justiça. Revista Brasileira De Ciências Sociais, 35(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant de Lima, R. (2010). Sensibilidades jurídicas, saber e poder: bases culturais de alguns aspectos do direito brasileiro em uma perspectiva comparada. Anuário Antropológico, 35(2), 25–51.

  • Kurlychek, M. C., & Johnson, B. D. (2019). Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 291–319.

  • Lages, L. B., & Ribeiro, L. (2019). Determinants of Pre-Trial Detention at the Custody Hearing: Reinforcement of Social Stereotypes. Direito GV Law Review, 15, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, M. (2007). Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: Diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 55(4), 617–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemgruber, J., & Fernandes, M. (2015). Tráfico de drogas na cidade do Rio de Janeiro: prisão provisória e direito de defesa. Boletim Segurança e Cidadania, 17, 1–50.

  • Levine, J. P. (1975). The Impact of “Gideon”: The Performance of Public & Private Criminal Defense Lawyers. Polity, 8(2), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, R. K. D., & Mouzinho, G. M. P. (2016). Produção e reprodução da tradição inquisitorial no Brasil: entre delações e confissões premiadas. Dilemas: revista de estudos de conflito e controle social. Rio de Janeiro: Necvu, Editora UFRJ, 2016.

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. SAGE. 296 p. (Advanced quantitative techniques in the social sciences series; 7.).

  • McIntyre, L. J. (1987). The public defender: The practice of law in the shadows of repute. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misse, M. (2010). Crime, sujeito e sujeição criminal: Aspectos de uma contribuição analítica sobre a categoria bandido. Lua Nova, 79, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. S. (1973). Effects of alternative types of counsel on criminal procedural treatment. Indiana Law Journal, 48, 404–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardulli, P. F. (1986). Insider justice: Defense attorneys and the handling of felony cases. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 379–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, et al. (2021). Diferenças entre a defesa pública e privada: Como elas afetam a condenação no processo de tráfico de drogas? Revista Juris Poiesis, 24(34), 845–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez, I. (2018). “Aqui não é casa de vingança, é casa de justiça!”: Moralidades, hierarquizações e desigualdades na administração de conflitos do tribunal do júri da comarca do Rio de Janeiro. Universidade Federal Fluminense.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B. F. (2004). Influences on disposition decisions in the juvenile justice system. Journal for Juvenile Justice Services, 19, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paes, V. (2013). Crimes, procedimentos e números: estudo sociológico sobre a gestão dos crimes na França e no Brasil, Garamond.

  • Pfaff, J. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.

  • Pires, A. P., & Cauchie, J. F. (2011). Um caso de inovação “acidental” em matéria de penas: A lei brasileira de drogas. Revista Direito GV, 7(1), 299–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattner, A., Turjeman, H., & Fishman, G. (2008). Public Versus Private Defense: Can Money Buy Justice? Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(1), 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengifo, A. F., & Marmolejo, L. (2020). Acción y representación: Indicadores de desempeño de la defensa en una muestra de audiencias de control de garantías en Colombia. Latin American Law Review, 4, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, L. M. L., Rocha, R. L. S., & Couto, V. A. (2017). Nas malhas da justiça: Uma análise dos dados oficiais de indiciados por drogas em Belo Horizonte (2008–2015). Opinião Pública, 23(2), 397–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, J. (2021). Roubar, furtar e traficar em Belo Horizonte: Determinantes da articulação para distintos fluxos da justiça criminal. Tese de doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Sociologia da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, 2021.

  • Sapori, L F. (1996). A defesa pública e a defesa constituída na justiça criminal brasileira. XX Encontro Anual da ANPOCS. Trabalho apresentado no Grupo de Trabalho Direitos, Identidades e Ordem Pública, Caxambú.

  • Sapori, L. F. (1995). A administração da justiça criminal numa área metropolitana. Revista Brasileira De Ciências Sociais, 10(29), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. (1997). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. Cambridge University Press.

  • Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2000). When Does Race Matter? An Analysis of the Conditions Under Which Race Affects Sentence Severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1981). The effect of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question. Law & Society Review, 16, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S. M. (2016). State-administered indigent defense systems, 2013. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ, 250249.

  • Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender Office. Social Problems, 12(3), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. G., Stanley, T. P., DeFlorio, B. J., & Seekamp, L. N. (1972). An analysis of defense counsel in the processing of felony defendants in San Diego, California. Denver Law Journal, 49, 233–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vainfas, R. (1999). Colonização, miscigenação e questão racial: Notas sobre equívocos e tabus da historiografia brasileira. Revista Tempo, 8(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J. D. (2008). Análise comparada do fluxo do sistema de justiça para o crime de estupro. Dados, 50(4), 671–697.

  • Vargas, J. (2014). Fluxo do sistema de justiça criminal. Crime, polícia e justiça no Brasil. Contexto, 1, 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G. R., & Wheeler, C. L. (1980). Reflection on legal representation of the economically disadvantaged: Beyond assembly-line justice. Crime & Delinquency, 26, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. R. (2013). The effectiveness of public defenders in four Florida counties. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willison, D. (1984). The effects of counsel on the severity of criminal sentences: A statistical assessment. Justice System Journal, 9, 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2003), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Thomson South-Western.

  • Zane, S. N., Singer, S. I., & Welsh, B. C. (2021). The Right to a Good Defense: Investigating the Influence of Attorney Type Across Urban Counties for Juveniles in Criminal Court. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(2), 162–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA

    Vitor Sousa Gonçalves

  2. CRISP/UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Vitor Sousa Gonçalves & Lívia Bastos Lages

  3. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    Lívia Bastos Lages & Victor Antunes Leocádio

Authors
  1. Vitor Sousa Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lívia Bastos Lages
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor Antunes Leocádio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitor Sousa Gonçalves.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

No potential competing interest in writing this article. The authors did not receive any benefit for writing it. They used data collected in the research project entitled "Drug Traffic Process Flow in Belo Horizonte", granted by the CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—301402/2018–3). This research was conducted by the Center for Studies in Criminality and Public Security (CRISP) at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonçalves, V.S., Lages, L.B. & Leocádio, V.A. Defenders at Law: Assessing the performance of legal defense on Drug Trafficking cases in Brazil. Crime Law Soc Change 79, 667–689 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10042-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10042-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation