Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Areas of Improvement in Suicide Risk Identification, Assessment, and Risk Mitigation Documentation by Mental Health Prescribers at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Veterans have a suicide rate 1.5 times higher than the non-veteran population. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented suicide risk screening recommendations in 2018. This project assessed the impact of mental health (MH) prescribers on these recommendations and identified areas of improvement.

Methods

Seventy MH Clinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPS) and 52 other MH prescribers were included. Patients with a positive question nine (from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and a same-day Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) between 11/01/18 and 11/01/19 at a VA system were reviewed. Completion of same-day Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE), same-day Suicide Prevention Safety Plan (SPSP), number of patients who were not offered naloxone despite access to opioids, and number of patients who were not offered a gunlock despite access to firearms were compared between groups. Time from C-SSRS to suicidal behavior was compared between those who did and did not receive a same-day CSRE.

Results

MH CPS were significantly more likely to complete a same-day CSRE (p = 0.0201) and SPSP (p < 0.001) when recommended. Naloxone outcomes were not assessed due to availability of only one data point. Rates of gunlock offers did not differ significantly between groups (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.3189) however there was no documentation stating why they were not offered when appropriate 40% of the time. Time to suicidal behavior did not vary across patients based on CSRE completion (p = 0.16).

Conclusion

MH CPS play an important role in suicide risk screening for veterans. There is a need for improvement regarding the offering and documentation of firearm risk mitigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Andrea Laguado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This project was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. Authors consulted extensively with the IRB of the South Texas Veterans Health Care System and that of UT Health San Antonio who determined that this project did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of both entities.

Informed Consent

This project was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. Authors consulted extensively with the IRB of the South Texas Veterans Health Care System and of UT Health San Antonio who determined that this project did not need informed consent since it utilized existing data and no identifiable data objects were recorded. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of both entities.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

PaCIR and SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines for pharmacist interventions and quality improvement projects were used in developing this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laguado, S.A., Steavenson, R. & Mehvar, M. Areas of Improvement in Suicide Risk Identification, Assessment, and Risk Mitigation Documentation by Mental Health Prescribers at a Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Adm Policy Ment Health 48, 633–638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01097-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-020-01097-0

Keywords

Navigation