Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlates of experiencing psychological violence during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: a global analysis of 25 countries from the I-SHARE research consortium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted all aspects of life. While there are reports on the effect of the pandemic on violence, few studies have examined its effect on psychological violence, which often goes unnoticed in research and practice. This paper compares the prevalence of psychological violence 3 months prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Correlates of psychological violence during the pandemic restrictions were also assessed.

Subject and methods

Data for this paper are from a cross-sectional online survey of 14,826 adults aged 18 and above from 25 of the 30 countries involved in the I-SHARE research consortium. A composite variable for psychological violence was derived from responses to questions that asked whether participants had experienced emotional abuse, financial abuse, or restricted contact with others prior to and during the pandemic, using validated survey instruments. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results

Overall prevalence of psychological violence was higher before (23.2%) compared to during (18.6%) the COVID-19 restrictions. Living with a partner, age, gender, sexual orientation, income, stringency of lockdown, and perceived vulnerability were significant correlates of the experience of psychological violence during the COVID-19 restrictions. A considerable proportion of respondents experienced psychological violence during the restrictions, although the prevalence was lower compared to prior the restrictions.

Conclusion

Interventions for violence prevention during pandemics such as COVID-19 should specifically enquire about psychological violence so that it can be promptly addressed, especially as it can be a precursor to physical violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and materials are available on request.

Notes

  1. The stringency index is a composite measure based on nine response indicators including cancellation of public events, school closure, and workplace closures, rescaled to a value from 0 to 100 (100 = strictest) (Hale et al. 2021)

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following individuals who contributed to this manuscript: Oloruntomiwa Oyetunde and Adenike Osiberu. In addition, we would like to thank the members of the research consortium (a list can be found at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tHIXp0sM92CrpNDASdN_3hGIH7rj2x9FWY4Gmze6lgs/edit#gid=0).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH; UG3HD096929 and NIAID K24AI143471). In Latvia, this research was supported by the National Research Programme to Lessen the Effects of COVID-19 (VPP-COVID-2020/1-0011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EA and AO developed the initial idea; RT led the data analysis group, which included EA and NM. All authors contributed to the initial draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Segun Adebayo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approvals were obtained from each country’s ethical review committee before study launch. Ethical approval was obtained from Ghent University (BC-07988) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (295989) for secondary data analysis of data from multiple countries.

Consent to participate

Online informed consent was obtained from all participants across the countries. All participants were at least 18 years old.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adebayo, E.S., Tan, R.K.J., Miall, N. et al. Correlates of experiencing psychological violence during the initial COVID-19 lockdown: a global analysis of 25 countries from the I-SHARE research consortium. J Public Health (Berl.) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02195-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02195-1

Keywords

Navigation