Summary
The polymorphic presentation of annular dermatoses in the pediatric population renders them a diagnostic challenge to the clinician. They include various distinct disease entities that can be vaguely categorized according to the age of onset. Herein, we report on a young girl with clinical characteristics of Wells’ syndrome, while histological findings favored the diagnosis of annular erythema of infancy (AEI). Although morphological and histological similarities do exist, AEI and eosinophilic annular erythema (EAE) of childhood are considered as distinct entities in the literature. Wells’ syndrome (WS) is an eosinophilic dermatosis and histologically characterized by eosinophilic dermal infiltration with the hallmark feature of “flame figures.” Based on this case, we discuss and review the differential diagnoses of annular dermatoses in children.
Zusammenfassung
Anuläre Dermatosen im Kindesalter stellen manchmal aufgrund ihres polymorphen Erscheinungsbildes eine Herausforderung im Klinikalltag dar. Sie umfassen verschiedene Krankheitsbilder, die grob nach den unterschiedlichen Altersgruppen eingeteilt werden können, in welchen sie sich erstmals manifestieren. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine Patientin vorgestellt, bei der klinisch das Bild eines Wells-Syndroms vorlag, histologisch jedoch die „Flammenfiguren“ fehlten und der Befund für ein anuläres Erythem sprach. Das anuläre Erythem im Säuglingsalter („annular erythema of infancy“; AEI) und das eosinophile anuläre Erythem des Kindesalters („eosinophilic annular erythema“, EAE) existieren als distinkte Krankheitsbilder mit teils morphologischen sowie histopathologischen Ähnlichkeiten. Das Wells-Syndrom ist eine eosinophile Dermatose und zeigt histologisch ein dermales Infiltrat mit Eosinophilen und den charakteristischen „Flammenfiguren“. Basierend auf diesem Patientenfall werden die Differenzialdiagnosen der anulären Dermatosen im Kindesalter diskutiert.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Case report
A one-and-a-half-year-old girl presented to our pediatric dermatology clinic with erythematous papules and annular succulent plaques with a greyish-green center, confined to the right buttock (Fig. 1a, b). The parents had been applying a topical steroid ointment prescribed by a private practitioner for a few days, without efficacy.
The child’s medical history included trigonocephaly for which she had had surgical reconstruction, but was otherwise uneventful.
Our initial clinical differential diagnoses included Wells’ syndrome and eosinophilic annular erythema of childhood.
Histopathology, obtained from the border of the red to the greyish area of an annular lesion, revealed a superficial and deep perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate with abundant CD68-positive macrophages (Fig. 1c, d).
White blood cell count and eosinophils were within the normal range. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and total serum IgE were both elevated, at 85.5 µg/L (normal value 13.3 µg/L) and 22.0 klU/L (age-adapted reference value < 10 kU/L), respectively. Family history of atopy and specific IgE antibodies to common inhalant and nutritive allergens were negative.
The lesions were treated with topical clobetasol propionate and occlusive dressing for 10 days, followed by once daily application that led to complete remission within 3 consecutive weeks. Since then, the patient has remained asymptomatic for the past 9 months without any further therapy.
Discussion
Annular dermatoses in pediatric patients include a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses that can only be definitely diagnosed based on subtle clinical variations in conjunction with histopathologic features. In some cases, laboratory investigations are mandatory to rule out serious complications (Table 1).
Annular erythema of infancy (AEI) and eosinophilic annular erythema (EAE) of childhood are described as distinct, rare inflammatory conditions of infancy and childhood [1,2,3,4,5]. There are only a few cases previously published in the literature; therefore, the true incidence of these dermatoses is unknown and is likely underreported [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
In 1981, Peterson and Jarratt originally coined the term AEI, for recurrent rapidly evolving arcuate and annular benign skin lesions, predominantly in infants from 3 to 11 months of age with spontaneous resolution within the first year of life. Histology consists of perivascular lymphocytes with scattered eosinophils [6]. Histiocytic infiltration has been described in HE staining but neither in that abundancy nor immunohistochemically (Fig. 1c, d; [7]). In contrast, EAE is thought to represent the morphological expression of a spectrum of eosinophilic dermatoses in older children that often follow a more recalcitrant clinical course, requiring immunomodulatory drugs. Histology shows a superficial and deep, predominantly perivascular, lymphocytic infiltrate with abundant eosinophils without “flame figures,” which are characteristic, but not pathognomonic, for Wells’ syndrome [1, 3, 8]. The only differences between AEI and EAE are the age of disease onset and the eosinophil count in histology (some in AEI and abundant in EAE), which results in a more transient rash in AEI or recalcitrant in EAE [3, 8].
Wells’ syndrome is a rare pruritic inflammatory skin disease of unknown etiology with several morphologic variants that have been described in recent years (papulonodular, papulovesicular, plaque-type, urticarial, or bullous). It classically presents as localized erythematous swelling (hence the term eosinophilic cellulitis), and subsequently progresses to indurated plaques with a characteristic green-greyish hue in the central part of the plaque.
In the present case, clinical findings were primarily compatible with Wells’ syndrome. The lack of eosinophils in histology, however, suggests otherwise, leaving room for debate. The natural tissue lifespan of eosinophils ranges from 2 to 5 days.7 Treatment with topical steroids downregulates interleukin (IL)-5, which is crucial for the recruitment and survival of eosinophils in tissue [9]. In hindsight it can only be speculated whether prior topical steroid treatment could obscure histopathologic findings (i.e., eradicate all tissue eosinophils).
Elevated levels of ECP in the absence of peripheral eosinophilia as well as the clinical presentation of annular succulent plaques with a greyish-green center (Fig. 1a, b) indicate eosinophil activation.
The age of onset after the first year of life would suggest EAE as the favorable diagnosis, while Wells’ syndrome does not have an age-specific predilection and is even considered to be rare in children [3, 8]. From our own experience, we know that Wells’ syndrome is probably underdiagnosed in many patients due to its polymorphic picture, as we have seen and successfully treated three children alone in the past 2 years. As the etiology is elusive in many cases, we propose that eosinophilic annular dermatoses in children might pose an academically unsatisfactory diagnostic dilemma. It remains to speculate whether they are different presentations of an identical pathophysiological process that lie within a spectrum and should not be exclusive of one another.
References
Rongioletti F, Fausti V, Kempf W, Rebora A, Parodi A. Eosinophilic annular erythema: an expression of the clinical and pathological polymorphism of Wells syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(4):e135–e7.
Kunz M, Hamm K, Brocker EB, Hamm H. Annular erythema in childhood—a new eosinophilic dermatosis. Hautarzt. 1998;49(2):131–4.
Abarzua A, Giesen L, Silva S, Gonzalez S. Eosinophilic annular erythema in childhood—Case report. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91(4):503–5.
Paulitschke V, Tittes J, Tanew A, Radakovic S. Eosinophilic annular erythema in a 20-month-old girl. Hautarzt. 2021;72(4):332–6.
Patrizi A, Savoia F, Varotti E, Gaspari V, Passarini B, Neri I. Neutrophilic figurate erythema of infancy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25(2):255–60.
Peterson AO Jr., Jarratt M. Annular erythema of infancy. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117(3):145–8.
Hebert AA, Esterly NB. Annular erythema of infancy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;14(2 Pt 2):339–43.
Hamidi S, Prose NS, Selim MA. Neutrophilic figurate erythema of infancy: A diagnostic challenge. J Cutan Pathol. 2019;46(3):216–20.
Park YM, Bochner BS. Eosinophil survival and apoptosis in health and disease. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010;2(2):87–101.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Doris Weiss, Tamar Kinaciyan; methodology: Doris Weiss, Tamar Kinaciyan, Julia Tittes; formal analysis and investigation: Tamar Kinaciyan; writing—original draft preparation: Doris Weiss, Tamar Kinaciyan; writing—review and editing: Doris Weiss, Amélie Hampel, Wolfgang Weninger, Tamar Kinaciyan; funding acquisition: none; resources: Doris Weiss, Tamar Kinaciyan; supervision: Tamar Kinaciyan.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
D. Weiss, P. Weber, A. Hampel, J. Tittes, W. Weninger, and T. Kinaciyan declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
For this case report no studies with human subjects or animals were performed. All investigations performed were in accordance with the ethical standards. As no images or other information within the manuscript identifies the patient, consent was not deemed necessary.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Prior presentation
Case report (poster at ESPD Annual Meeting 2021)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, D., Weber, P., Hampel, A. et al. Diagnostic difficulties in pediatric annular dermatoses. Wien Med Wochenschr (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01019-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01019-3