Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective comparative analysis of 163 patients

  • original article
  • Published:
European Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Objective

To analyze the benefit and feasibility of single-incisional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (SIL TEP) repair compared with those of conventional laparoscopic TEP (CL TEP).

Methods

The procedure of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy includes medial, lateral, and sac dissection with mesh positioning. The actual procedure performed during SIL TEP is the same as those of CL TEP, except for the number of incisions. We performed SIL TEP in 23 patients with an inguinal hernia. The operative and short-term outcomes, including postoperative complications and recurrence, were analyzed and compared with 140 cases of CL TEP.

Results

Age, gender, BMI, comorbidity, ASA score, and types of hernia were similar in both groups. Also, operation time, open or transabdominal preperitoneal conversion rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative complication rate, and recurrence were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion

SIL TEP is as feasible and safe a procedure as laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surgeons familiar with single-incision laparoscopic surgeries like appendectomy or cholecystectomy can begin to perform SIL TEP for hernia repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

ASIS:

Anterior superior iliac spine

BMI:

Body mass index

CL:

Conventional laparoscopic

MIS:

Minimally invasive surgery

SIL:

Single-incision laparoscopic

TAPP:

Transabdominal preperitoneal

TEP:

Totally extraperitoneal

References

  1. Yang GP, Tung KL. A comparative study of single incision versus conventional laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2015;19(3):401–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzy A, Lomanto D. A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare single-port endo-laparoscopic surgery versus conventional TEP inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(11):3053–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perivoliotis K, Tzovaras G, Sarakatsianou C, Baloyiannis I. Current status of single-port versus multi-port approach in laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2019;23(2):217–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lomnicki J, Leszko A, Kulis D, Szura M. Current treatment of the inguinal hernia—the role of the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair. Folia Med Cracov. 2018;58(3):103–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung Y, Choi JW, Kim HC, Kim SH, Choi SI. Feasibility of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic hernia repair in elderly patients. Hernia. 2019;23(2):299–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Han YD, Park S, Kim WR, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, et al. Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: comparative study with conventional laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(3):253–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JH, An CH, Lee YS, Kim HY, Lee JI. Single incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (SIL-TEP): experience of 512 procedures. Hernia. 2015;19(3):417–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lai H, Li G, Xiao J, Lin Y, Lu B. Single-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty versus multi-incision laparoscopic hernioplasty: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84(3):128–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakasugi M, Masuzawa T, Tei M, Omori T, Ueshima S, Tori M, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: our initial 100 cases and comparison with conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Surg Today. 2015;45(5):606–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wijerathne S, Agarwal N, Ramzi A, Liem DH, Tan WB, Lomanto D. Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1356–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi BJ, Jeong WJ, Lee IK, Lee SC. Single-port versus conventional three-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2016;20(6):789–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY. Learning curve for laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. Can J Surg. 2012;55(1):33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wakasugi M, Nakahara Y, Hirota M, Matsumoto T, Kusu T, Takemoto H, et al. Learning curve for single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019;12(3):301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suguita FY, Essu FF, Oliveira LT, Iuamoto LR, Kato JM, Torsani MB, et al. Learning curve takes 65 repetitions of totally extraperitoneal laparoscopy on inguinal hernias for reduction of operating time and complications. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):3939–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang BM, Hwang JW, Ryu BY. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(11):4968–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang BM, Choi SI, Kim BS, Lee SH. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(7):3131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Arezzo A, Passera R, Forcignano E, Rapetti L, Cirocchi R, Morino M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3739–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vierra M. Minimally invasive surgery. Annu Rev Med. 1995;46:147–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JW, Sung SW, Park JK, Park CH, Song KY. Laparoscopic gastric tube formation with pyloromyotomy for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015;89(3):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae Sung Kim M.D..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J.W. Lee, E.Y. Kim, A. Bat-Ulzii, A.R. Sharma, and H.S. Kim declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Availability of data and materials

The material supporting the conclusion of this study has been included in the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.W., Kim, E.Y., Bat-Ulzii, A. et al. Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective comparative analysis of 163 patients. Eur Surg 53, 294–298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00646-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00646-z

Keywords

Navigation