Introduction

Acute kidney Injury (AKI) is a frequent complication in critically ill patients with high morbidity and mortality. Sepsis is the most common cause of AKI in intensive care units, and it is observed in 40–50% of patients with AKI [1]. In septic AKI, various inflammatory mediators are involved in the deterioration of the disease state, and control of these mediators is a possible therapeutic approach. One approach to regulate mediators in the blood of AKI patients is renal replacement therapy (RRT). The main purpose of RRT is water removal, electrolyte correction, and removal of low molecular weight uremic toxins. Removal of mediators, such as inflammatory cytokines, also contributes to the improvement of the disease state.

To enhance the efficiency of the removal of inflammatory mediators, a variety of RRT modalities have been evaluated, including high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF), very high-volume hemofiltration (VHVHF), and high cut-off (HCO) membranes. However, these attempts have not led to significant improvements in therapeutic efficacy, suggesting that blood purification using the principles of filtration and dialysis was not effective for the enhancement of mediator removal. [2,3,4]. Removal of mediators by membrane adsorption has recently attracted attention as an alternative [5, 6]. Various polymers, such as polysulfone (PS), cellulose acetate, and polyacrylonitrile, are used for the hollow fibers of RRT hemofilters, and each has different characteristics. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is a unique membrane material with protein adsorption function that reportedly adsorbs various inflammatory cytokines [7, 8]. However, the degree of adsorption depends on the type of cytokine. Additionally, the relationship between the molecular properties of cytokines and adsorption on PMMA membranes has not been clarified.

The purpose of this study was to comprehensively analyze the adsorption of different cytokines to a PMMA membrane and clarify the characteristics of protein adsorption compared with a PS membrane.

Materials and methods

Cytokine adsorption

In this in vitro study, two different membrane hemofilters were used; a PMMA membrane hemofilter (Hemofeel CH-W1.8, Toray Industries, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and PS membrane hemofilter (Hemofeel SNV-1.0, Toray Industries, Inc.). The outer cylinder case of each filter was cut and the hollow fibers inside were removed and used. A 105-cm-long PMMA hollow fiber and a 75.5-cm-long PS hollow fiber, both with a 0.0228-cm3 volume, were further prepared for the adsorption experiment. This volume matches the ratio of plasma volume to hollow fiber volume in a clinical setting. The hollow fibers were shredded into approximately 1-mm lengths [9], washed with normal saline, and used for the adsorption experiments.

Human plasma containing cytokines were prepared as follows. A freeze-dried, standard cytokine mixture containing 48 different cytokines and growth factors (Bio-Plex-pro 48 Plex Kit, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was reconstituted with 0.25 mL citrated human plasma (Tennessee Blood Services, Memphis, TN, USA) and vortexed for 5 s to mix completely. This stock solution was diluted tenfold with the same human plasma and was further used as the cytokine mixture solution for the adsorption experiments. The molecular weight, isoelectric point, and concentrations used for the adsorption experiments of each cytokine are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of cytokines

A schematic diagram of the experimental procedure is shown in Fig. 1. The hollow fiber fragments described above were suspended in 1080 μL of the cytokine solution and allowed to react for 2 h at 37 °C. During the reaction, the tube was slowly stirred using a rotator to maintain uniform contact between the plasma solution and hollow fiber fragments. After the reaction, the tubes were stored without stirring for 1 min to allow the hollow fibers to settle, and the plasma at the top was collected with a pipette and transferred to another tube to measure the cytokines. The same cytokine solution was incubated without hollow fiber fragments and used as a blank control.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic procedure of in vitro adsorption experiment of cytokines on hollow fiber fragments

The cytokine measurements were performed using the Bio-Plex-pro 48 Plex Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. The adsorption rate of each cytokine was calculated by the following formula.

$${\text{Adsorption rate }}\left( \% \right)\, = \,{1}00{-}\left( {{\text{Concentration after incubation with hollow fiber fragments}}/{\text{Concentration after incubation of blank control}}} \right)\, \times \,{1}00$$

Electron microscopy

The hollow fibers were frozen by immersing them in liquid nitrogen. The samples were then folded to expose the fiber cross section and vacuum dried to produce dried samples. A thin film of platinum was then created on the sample surface by sputtering to observe the sample. The dried samples were observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM–EDX Type H, Hitachi High-Tech Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The results of adsorption experiments were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of four independent experiments. Student’s t test was used to compare data between two groups and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The correlation between the adsorption rate and molecular weight or isoelectric point of the cytokines were tested by Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis.

Results

Figure 2 shows the adsorption rates of cytokines incubated with hollow fiber fragments of the PMMA and PS membranes for 2 h at 37 °C. Adsorption experiments were performed four times for each membrane, and the mean values and standard deviations are shown. The PMMA membrane generally showed a high adsorption rate. However, the adsorption rates varied depending on the type of cytokine, from less than 10% to more than 90%. Alternatively, adsorptions to the PS membrane were generally low. When comparing the adsorption rate of PMMA and PS membranes for each cytokine, PMMA showed higher adsorption properties than PS for 38 of the 48 cytokines, and PS showed higher adsorption for only two (FGF basic, and SCGF-β) of the 48 cytokines. For eight cytokines, there were no significant differences between PMMA and PS.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Adsorption rate of each cytokine. Human plasma containing 48 different cytokines was incubated with fragments of PMMA (blue bar) or PS (green bar) hollow fiber fragments for 2 h. The adsorption rate was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods, and depicted as percent adsorption

To examine which characteristics of the cytokines are important for adsorption to the PMMA membrane, the relationships between the molecular weight and adsorption rate, and between the isoelectric point and adsorption rate were examined (Fig. 3). For the molecular weight, a significant correlation was observed with higher adsorption rates for smaller molecular weight cytokines. For the isoelectric point, there was no obvious correlation to the adsorption rate, which suggests that the molecular size is more important than the charge of the molecule for adsorption to the PMMA membrane.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlations between the adsorption rate of cytokines to the PMMA membrane and (A) molecular weight or (B) isoelectric point of the molecules

The internal structure of the hollow fiber membranes was examined by scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 4). The PS membrane had an asymmetric structure with a dense inner surface and a sparse outer surface, while the PMMA hollow fiber had a structure with uniform density from the inner to outer surface with nano-pores, which confirms that the structures of the two membranes were different.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Scanning electron microscope images of the PMMA and PS hemofilter hollow fiber membranes

Discussion

In this in vitro study, the adsorption of 48 different cytokines to a PMMA hollow fiber membrane was evaluated; more than half of the cytokines were adsorbed with high efficiency, with an adsorption rate greater than 50%. Alternatively, adsorption to the PS membrane was lower than to the PMMA membrane. Considering the correlation between molecular weight and the adsorption to the PMMA membrane, a significant correlation was observed with a higher adsorption rates for smaller molecular weight cytokines. Cytokines with a molecular weight range of 10,000–30,000 Da generally adsorbed with high efficiency, while the adsorption rate of cytokines with molecular weight exceeding 30,000 Da tended to be low. There was no clear correlation between the isoelectric point of the cytokine and adsorption rate.

The mechanism of cytokine adsorption to the PMMA membrane is unclear. However, because PMMA is a polymer with hydrophobic properties and does not have a strong electric charge, we speculate that hydrophobic interactions trigger the adsorption. In addition, the PMMA membrane has nano-pores on the surface and inside the membrane, as observed in the electron microscopic image. Cytokines are likely adsorbed by fitting into these nano-pores. The high adsorption rate of cytokines with a molecular weight range of 10,000–30,000 may be attributed to the size of these pores, which fit these molecule sizes.

In addition to PMMA, acrylonitrile/sodium methallyl sulfonate copolymer (AN69) exhibits protein adsorption properties. In the case of AN69, the negative charge inside the membrane contributes to protein adsorption, and cationic substances are adsorbed at higher rates than neutral or anionic substances [7]. This type of adsorption applies to proteins and small molecules. For example, nafamostat mesylate, which is used as an anticoagulant in extracorporeal circulation, has a positive charge and is adsorbed to AN69 membranes [10, 11]. Therefore, an increased dose of the drug should be considered in extracorporeal circulation using AN69 membranes. The membranes of hemofilters may adsorb hazardous substances and various useful components in the blood and drugs including antimicrobials [12, 13]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct confirmatory studies on the adsorption of various low molecular weight substances for each membrane material.

Cytokine levels are markedly elevated in patients with septic AKI and highly associated with severity of disease. In clinical practice, RRT with a PMMA hemofilter decreases the blood cytokine levels and improves the patient conditions. For example, in a study of 43 patients with septic shock, Nakada et al. reported that RRT using a PMMA hemofilter markedly reduced IL-6 levels in the blood and showed clinical effects, such as a rapid increase in urine output and improvement in hemodynamics [14]. In a recent study using a pig model of septic AKI, treatment with a PMMA hemofilter was more effective in the recovery of kidney function than a PS hemofilter because of inhibition of the complement activation and reduction of renal fibrosis and circulatory inflammatory factors [15]. These results suggest the clinical usefulness of a PMMA hemofilter in septic AKI patients.

This study has several limitations. This study investigated the characteristics of PMMA and PS as membrane materials, and the results may not precisely reflect clinical practice using an actual filter. In addition, the study was conducted using human plasma, which may be different from whole blood. The details of cytokine adsorption characteristics to a PMMA hemofilter in clinical settings and its contribution to the clinical effects on septic AKI need to be validated by large comparative clinical studies including the evaluation of filtration performance of the hemofilters.

Conclusion

We evaluated the adsorption of 48 different cytokines to hemofilter membranes by in vitro experiments. The PMMA membrane adsorbs more cytokines than a PS membrane, and the adsorption efficiency to the PMMA membrane depends on the molecular weight of the cytokines, which may be reflected by the structure of the membrane. The contribution of cytokine adsorption to a PMMA hemofilter on its clinical efficacy should be investigated in clinical studies.