Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors of gynecological bleeding in female patients with left-ventricular assist device

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Heart (Clinical)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women with implantable left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) experience gynecological bleeding (GYN-bleeding). However, a few studies have investigated female-specific problems. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the risk factors for adverse GYN-bleeding after LVAD implantation. We retrospectively analyzed 59 women (mean age: 41 ± 15 years) with long-term implantable LVAD support (≥ 6 months) at our institution between 2005 and 2018. The history of GYN-bleeding before implantation was defined as abnormal utero-ovarian bleeding, excessive menstruation, uterine fibroids, and endometrial lesions. GYN-bleeding after implantation was defined as a requirement of emergency outpatient visits and/or hospitalization, blood transfusions, hormonal therapy, and/or surgery. Additionally, risk factors for GYN-bleeding were identified using the Cox regression model. Twenty-four GYN-bleeding cases were seen in 15 patients (two times: five patients, three times: two patients, 0.18 events per patient-year). The 1- and 2-year GYN-bleeding-free rates were 84% and 73%, respectively. Twelve patients (17 events) required RBC ≥ 4 units, and five patients (7 events) required FFP ≥ 4 units. Seven patients required pseudomenopausal treatment after blood transfusion, and four patients required surgical treatment. Fifteen patients with GYN-bleeding after implantation were significantly younger than the remaining 44 patients without GYN-bleeding (34 ± 12 years vs. 43 ± 16 years, P = 0.02). Multivariable risk analysis showed a history of GYN-bleeding before implantation was a significant risk factor (hazard ratio 3.7 [1.2–10.6], P = 0.004). Patients with a history of GYN-bleeding before LVAD implantation have a high risk of developing GYN-bleeding after implantation. We should identify the high-risk population and prepare for the management of GYN-bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, et al. Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34:1495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1080–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, et al. Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2241–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ono M, Sawa Y, Nakatani T, et al. Japanese multicenter outcomes with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device in patients with small body surface area. Circ J. 2016;80:1931–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Toda K, Sawa Y. Clinical management for complications related to implantable LVAD use. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;63:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Teuteberg JJ, Cleveland JC Jr, Cowger J, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 annual report: the changing landscape of devices and indications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:649–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DeFilippis EM, Truby LK, Garan AR, et al. Sex-related differences in use and outcomes of left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogaev RC, Pamboukian SV, Moore SA, et al. Comparison of outcomes in women versus men using a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:515–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yavar Z, Cowger JA, Moainie SL, Salerno CT, Ravichandran AK. Bleeding complication rates are higher in females after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. ASAIO J. 2018;64:748–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meeteren JV, Maltais S, Dunlay SM, et al. A multi-institutional outcome analysis of patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation stratified by sex and race. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daoud D, Cheema FH, Morgan JA, Loor G. Sex-related differences in outcomes of thoracic organ transplantation and mechanical circulatory support. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018;45:240–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stulak JM, Lee D, Haft JW, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding and subsequent risk of thromboembolic events during support with a left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshioka D, Okazaki S, Toda K, et al. Prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in patients with continuous-flow. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshioka D, Toda K, Ono M, et al. Clinical results, adverse events, and change in end-organ function in elderly patients with HeartMateII left ventricular assist device—Japanese multicenter study. Circ J. 2018;82:409–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JH, Singh R, Pagani FD, et al. Ventricular assist device therapy in older patients with heart failure: characteristics and outcomes. J Card Fail. 2016;22:981–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinugawa K, Nishimura T, Toda K, et al. The second official report from Japanese registry for mechanical assisted circulatory support (J-MACS): first results of bridge to bridge strategy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68:102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de By TMMH, Mohacsi P, Gahl B, et al. The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): second report. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:309–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, Dubois RW. A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding. Value Health. 2007;10:183–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Colvin MM, Cook JL, Chang PP, et al. Sensitization in heart transplantation: emerging knowledge: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2019;139:e553–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.jp) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by YT, DY, KT, TS, TK, NK, AK, RM, TW, MT, and SM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YT and all authors commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuji Tominaga or Daisuke Yoshioka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tominaga, Y., Yoshioka, D., Toda, K. et al. Risk factors of gynecological bleeding in female patients with left-ventricular assist device. J Artif Organs 25, 110–116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-021-01292-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-021-01292-2

Keywords

Navigation