Abstract
The climate features over Central America and the Caribbean are simulated with the regional climate model RegCM4 to analyze the performance of the model in reproducing precipitation and temperature patterns over the region. Results from RegCM4 and the driving global climate model (GCM) HadGEM2-ES (HadG) are compared against gridded observations for a period from January 1980 to December 2004 using a perturbed physics ensemble formed by four configurations of the RegCM4 using different combinations of four convection schemes run over land and ocean areas: Kain Fritsch (Kf), Emanuel (Em), Grell (Ge), and Tiedtke (Tk). The added value of RegCM4 relative to the GCM simulation is also estimated, with focus over four subregions, using several metrics calculated on the RegCM4 as well as the GCM grids. The RegCM4 downscaling, expressed by the ensemble mean ENS, adds significant details to the HadG simulation of the temperature field patterns, showing smaller biases of up to ± 1.6 °C at the RCM resolution. Regarding the spatial patterns of precipitation, the HadG has overall higher correlation values with observations than ENS. However, the regional model provides more detailed spatial distributions, decreasing the bias by more than 1 mm/day over some of the islands. It also captures extreme precipitation events that are underestimated in the HadG simulation, even after upscaling to the GCM resolution grid. Concerning the performance of the different RegCM4 convection scheme combinations, KfEm and EmEm show the highest skill values for precipitation, while for temperature TkEm and GeEm are the best performing. This highlights that no individual scheme outperforms the others in all respects, while the application of the averaged ensemble technique provides the best results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeniyi MO (2019) Sensitivities of the Tiedtke and Kain-Fritsch convection schemes for RegCM4.5 over West Africa. Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management 7(2):27–37. https://doi.org/10.26491/mhwm/103797
Adler RF, Huffman GJ, Chang A, Ferraro R, Xie P-P, Janowiak J, Rudolf B, Schneider U, Curtis S, Bolvin D, Gruber A, Susskind J, Arkin P, Nelkin E (2003) The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–Present). J Hydrometeorol 4(6):1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2
Anthes RA, Kuo Y-H, Hsie E-Y, Low-Nam S, Bettge TW (1989) Estimation of skill and uncertainty in regional numerical models. Q J R Meteorol Soc 115:763–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711548803
Arakawa A, Lamb VR (1977) Computational design of the basic dynamical process of the UCLA General Circulation Model. Methods Comput Phys 17:173–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-460817-7.50009-4
Castro CL, Pielke R Sr, Leoncini G (2005) Dynamical downscaling: assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J Geophys Res 110. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004721
Centella-Artola A, Taylor MA, Bezanilla-Morlot A, Martinez-Castro D, Campbell JD, Stephenson TS, Vichot A (2015) Assessing the effect of domain size over the Caribbean region using the PRECIS regional climate model. Clim Dyn 44(7–8):1901–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2272-8
Curtis S, Gamble D (2007). Regional variations of the Caribbean mid-summer drought. Theor Appl Climatol 94(25) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-007-0342-0
De Sales F, Xue Y (2013) Dynamic downscaling of 22-year CFS winter seasonal hindcasts with the UCLA-ETA regional climate model over the United. Clim Dyn 41:255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1567-x
Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut JN, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
Di Luca A, de Elía R, Laprise R (2012) Potential for added value in precipitation simulated by high-resolution nested Regional Climate Models and observations. Clim Dyn 38:1229–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1068-3
Di Luca A, de Elía R, Laprise R (2013a) Potential for small scale added value of RCM’s downscaled climate change signal. Clim Dyn 40:601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1415-z
Di Luca A, de Elía R, Laprise R (2013b) Potential for added value in temperature simulated by high-resolution nested RCMs in present climate and in the climate change signal. Clim Dyn 40:443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1384-2
Di Luca A, de Elía R, Laprise R (2015) Challenges in the quest for added value of regional climate dynamical downscaling. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0003-9
Di Luca A, Argüeso D, Evans JP, Elía R, Laprise R (2016) Quantifying the overall added value of dynamical downscaling and the contribution from different spatial scales. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:1575–1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024009
Dickinson RE, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy PJ (1993) Biosphere-atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model (No. NCAR/TN-387+STR). University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.5065/D67W6959
Emanuel KA (1991) A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J Atmos Sci 48(21):2313–2329. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2313:ASFRCC>2.0.CO;2
Feser F (2006) Enhanced detectability of added value in limited-area model results separated into different spatial scales. Mon Weather Rev 134(8):2180–2190. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3183.1
Funk C, Peterson P, Landsfeld M, Pedreros D, Verdin J, Shukla S et al (2015) The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci Data 2:150066. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66
Giorgi F (1991) Sensitivity of Simulated Summertime Precipitation over the Western United States to Different Physics Parameterizations. Mon Weather Rev 119:2870–2888. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<2870:SOSSPO>2.0.CO;2
Giorgi F (2019) Thirty years of regional climate modeling: where are we and where are we going next? J Geophys Res Atmos 124:5696–5723. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030094
Giorgi F, Gutowski WJ (2015) Regional dynamical downscaling and the CORDEX initiative. Annu Rev Environ Resour 40(1):467–490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217
Giorgi F, Marinucci MR (1991) Validation of a regional atmospheric model over Europe: Sensitivity of wintertime and summertime simulations to selected physics parametrizations and lower boundary conditions. Q J R Meteorol Soc 117:1171–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711750204
Giorgi F, Mearns LO (1991) Approaches to the simulation of regional climate change: a review. Rev Geophys 29(2):191–216. https://doi.org/10.1029/90RG02636
Giorgi F, Marinucci MR, Bates GT, De Canio G (1993) Development of a second-generation regional climate model (RegCM2). Part II: Convective processes and assimilation of lateral boundary conditions. Mon Weather Rev 121(10):2814–2832. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<2814:DOASGR>2.0.CO;2
Giorgi F, Huang Y, Nishizawa K, Fu C (1999) A seasonal cycle simulation over eastern Asia and its sensitivity to radiative transfer and surface processes. J Geophys Res Atmos 104(D6):6403–6423. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200052
Giorgi F, Coppola E, Solmon F, Mariotti L et al (2012) RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains. Clim Res 52:7–29. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01018
Giorgi F, Coppola E, Raffaele F (2014) A consistent picture of the hydroclimatic response to global warming from multiple indices: models and observations. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(20):11,611–695,708. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022238
Giorgi F, Torma C, Coppola E, Ban N, Schär C, Somot S (2016) Enhanced summer convective rainfall at Alpine high elevations in response to climate warming. Nat Geosci https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2761
Grell GA (1993) Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Mon Weather Rev 121(3):764–787. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<0764:PEOAUB>2.0.CO;2
Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer D (1994) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) (No. NCAR/TN-398+STR). University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.5065/D60Z716B
Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2014) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int J Climatol 34(3):623–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711
Holtslag AAM, De Bruijn EIF, Pan H-L (1990) A high resolution air mass transformation model for short-range weather forecasting. Mon Weather Rev 118(8):1561–1575. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1561:AHRAMT>2.0.CO;2
Huang D, Gao S (2017) Impact of different cumulus convective parameterization schemes on the simulation of precipitation over China. Tellus A 69:1406264. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2017.1406264
Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1989) A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47(23):2784–2802. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<2784:AODEPM>2.0.CO;2
Kiehl JT, Hack JJ, Bonan GB, Boville BA, Briegleb BP, Williamson DL, Rasch PJ (1996) Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3) (No. NCAR/TN-420+STR). University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. https://doi.org/10.5065/D6FF3Q99
Lecha LB, Paz LB (1994) El clima de Cuba. Editorial Academia, La Habana, 186 pp
Loveland TR, Reed BC, Brown JF, Ohlen DO, Zhu Z, Yang L, Merchant JW (2000) Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1km AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens 21(6–7):1303–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600210191
Lucas-Picher P, Laprise R, Winger K (2017) Evidence of added value in North American regional climate model hindcast simulations using ever-increasing horizontal resolutions. Clim Dyn 48:2611–2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3227-z
Maity S (2020) Comparative assessment of two RegCM versions in simulating Indian Summer Monsoon. J Earth Syst Sci 129(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-1340-1
Magaña V, Amador JA and Medina S (1999) The mid-summer drought over Mexico and Central America. J Climate 12:1577–1588
Martin GM, Bellouin N, Collins WJ, Culverwell ID, Halloran PR, Hardiman SC, Hinton TJ et al (2011) The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model climate configurations. Geosci Model Dev 4(3):723–757
Martínez-Castro D, da Rocha RP, Bezanilla-Morlot A, AlvarezEscudero L, Reyes-Fernández JP, Silva-Vidal Y, Arritt RW (2006) Sensitivity studies of the RegCM-3 simulation of summer precipitation, temperature and local wind field in the Caribbean Region. Theor Appl Climatol 86:5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-005-0201-9
Martínez-Castro D, Vichot-Llano A, Benzanilla-Morlot A, Centella-Artola A, Campbell J, Viloria-Holguin V (2016) Performance of RegCM-4.3 over the Caribbean region using different configurations of the Tiedtke convective parametrization scheme. Revista de Climatología 16:77–98 http://www.climatol.eu/reclim/reclim16f.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2016
Martínez-Castro D, Vichot-Llano A, Bezanilla-Morlot A, Centella-Artola A, Campbell J, Giorgi F, Viloria-Holguin, CC (2017) The performance of RegCM4 over the Central America and Caribbean region using different cumulus parameterizations. Climate Dynamics, 50(11–12):4103–4126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3863-y
Martínez-Castro D, Vichot-Llano A, Bezanilla-Morlot A, Centella-Artola A, Campbell J, Giorgi F, Viloria-Holguin CC (2018) The performance of RegCM4 over the Central America and Caribbean region using different cumulus parameterizations. Clim Dyn 50(11–12):4103–4126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3863-y
Mearns LO, Giorgi F, Whetton P, Pabon D, Hulme M, Lal M (2003) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from regional climate model experiments. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): Data Distribution Centre (DDC), Norwich, Hamburg and New York, 38 pp
Mitchell DT, Jones P (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25:693–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1181
Pal JS, Giorgi F, Bi X, Elguindi N, Solomon F, Gao X, Francisco R, Zakey A, Winter J, Ashfaq M, Syed F, Bell JL, Diffanbaugh NS, Kamacharya J, Konare A, Martinez D, da Rocha RP, Sloan LC, Steiner A (2007) The ICTP RegCM3 and RegCNET: regional climate modeling for the developing world. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1395–1409
Prömmel K, Geyer B, Jones JM, Widmann M (2010) Evaluation of the skill and added value of a reanalysis-driven regional simulation for Alpine temperature. Int J Climatol 30:760–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1916
Rauscher SA, Giorgi F, Diffenbaugh NS, Seth A (2008) Extension and Intensification of the Meso-American mid-summer drought in the twentyfirst century. Clim Dyn 31:551–571
Reynolds WR, Smith TM (1994) Improved global sea surface temperature analyses using optimum interpolation. J Clim 7:929–948. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<0929:IGSSTA>2.0.CO;2
Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17(4):347–348. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2008/0309
Rummukainen M (2016) Added value in regional climate modeling. Clim Chan 7:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.378
Schulzweida Uwe (2019) CDO User Guide (Version 1.9.8). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3539275
Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Bronaugh DR (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:1716–1733. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50203
Simmons JA, Uppala S, Dee D, Kobayashi S (2007) ERAInterim: New ECMWF reanalysis products from 1989 onwards. In ECMWF Newsletter (Vol. 110)
Sun L, Moncunill DF, Li H, Moura AD, Filho FAS (2005) Climate downscaling over Nordeste, Brazil, using the NCEP RSM97. J Clim 18(4):551–567. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3266.1
Taylor MA, Alfaro E (2005) Climate of Central America and the Caribbean. In: Oliver JE (ed) Encyclopedia of world climatology. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–189
Tiedtke M (1989) A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon Weather Rev 117(8):1779–1800. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
Torma C, Giorgi F, Coppola E (2015) Added value of regional cli-mate modeling over areas character-ized by complex terrain—precipitation over the Alps. J Geophys Res Atmos 120:3957–3972. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022781
Vichot-Llano A, Martínez-Castro D, Centella-Artola A, Bezanilla-Morlot A (2014) Sensibilidad al cambio de dominio y resolución de tres configuraciones del modelo climático regional RegCM 4.3 para la región de América Central y el Caribe. Revista de Climatología 14:45–62 http://www.climatol.eu/reclim/reclim14e.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2014
Winterfeldt J, Weisse R (2009) Assessment of value added for surface marine wind speed obtained from two regional climate models. Mon Weather Rev 137(9):2955–2965. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2704.1
Xie P, Arkin PA (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(11):2539–2558. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2539:GPAYMA>2.0.CO;2
Zeng X, Dickinson RE (1998) Effect of surface sublayer on surface skin temperature and fluxes. J Clim 11(4):537–550. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0537:EOSSOS>2.0.CO;2
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to the ICTP “Earth System Physics” (ESP) group for providing the regional climate model RegCM4, access to the “Argo” supercomputer cluster and technical assistance and to the Associateship Program, funded by the Simons Foundation. We also thank the “Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre” (CCCCC) for its support.
Funding
This study was supported by funding from Technology and Environment (CITMA) of Cuba through the project SUPERCLIMA of the Institute of Meteorology of Cuba (INSMET) and the “Sandwich Training Educational Program” (STEP) of the International Centre for Atmospheric Physics (ICTP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vichot-Llano, A., Martinez-Castro, D., Giorgi, F. et al. Comparison of GCM and RCM simulated precipitation and temperature over Central America and the Caribbean. Theor Appl Climatol 143, 389–402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03400-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03400-3