Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tracking biological footprints of climate change using flowering phenology of the geophytes: Pancratium tenuifolium and Scadoxus multiflorus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought-adapted geophytes are responding to the effects of climate change in arid and semi-arid environments. In this study, herbarium and historical rainfall data were used to examine the impact of rainfall changes on flowering trends of Pancratium tenuifolium Hochst. ex A.Rich and Scadoxus multiflorus (Martyn) Raf. subsp. multiflorus. Flowering was delayed by approximately 7 days per decade for P. tenuifolium during the period 1930 to 2018 and by approximately 14 days per decade for S. multiflorus subsp. multiflorus during the period 1924 to 2008. Scadoxus multiflorus subsp. multiflorus delayed the day of flowering by approximately 0.3 days per millimetre increase of rainfall, with Pancratium tenuifolium showing a non-significant response to summer rainfall during the same period. Overall, a linear mixed-effects model revealed that the day of flowering was delayed by approximately 8 days per degree rise in latitude and advanced by approximately 9 days per degree rise in longitude. Additionally, summer rainfall had significant effects on the day of flowering with a 1-mm increase in summer rainfall delaying the day of flowering by approximately 0.16 days. These changes in flowering times may ultimately alter the distribution of geophytes in Namibia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The herbarium data associated with this publication are deposited at the National Herbarium of Namibia.

References

  • Abu-Asab MS, Peterson PM, Shetler SG, Orli SS (2001) Earlier plant flowering in spring as a response to global warming in the Washington, DC, area. Biodivers Conserv 10:597–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MK (1997) From tillage to table: the indigenous cultivation of geophytes for food in California. J Ethnobiol 17(2):149–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatley JC (1974) Phenological events and their environmental triggers in Mojave Desert ecosystems. Ecology 55:856–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman AD, Vellend M, Frei ER, Henry GHR (2017) Climate adaptation is not enough: warming does not facilitate success of southern tundra plant populations in the high Arctic. Glob Chang Biol 23:1540–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Jee N, Casebow A, Leuchner M, Menzel A (2015) Climate sensitivity and variation in first flowering of 26 Narcissus cultivars. Int J Biometeorol 59:477–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Calinger, KM (2014) Investigating the footprint of climate change on phenology and ecological interactions in north-central North America. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology - Volume 10 - volume 10, April 2014. pp. 1–29

  • Calinger KM, Queenborough S, Curtis PS (2013) Herbarium specimens reveal the footprint of climate change on flowering trends across north-central North America. Ecol Lett 16:1037–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins TM, Crimmins MA, Bertelsen CD (2011) Onset of summer flowering in a ‘Sky Island’ is driven by monsoon moisture. New Phytol 191:468–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC, Nanda H, Rajaratnam N (1972) The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vynck JC, Van Wyk BE, Cowling RM (2016) Indigenous edible plant use by contemporary Khoe-San descendants of South Africa’s Cape South Coast. S Afr J Bot 102:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Demissew S, Nordal I, Stabbetorp OE (2003) Flowers of Ethiopia and Eritrea: aloes and other lilies. Shama’s Nature Series, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirkx E, Hager C, Tadross M, Bethune S, Curtis B (2008) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessment Namibia. Desert Research Foundation Namibia and Climate Systems Analysis Group. UCT, Windhoek, pp 149–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan G (2001) Spectacular, Rewarding Scadoxus. Veld Flora 87(1):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty BP, Hove AA, Mazer SJ (2012) Skeletons in the closet: preserved plants reveal phenological responses to climate change. Guide and practice data set for college and public audiences for analyzing long-term phenological data. Available online at the California Phenology Project website www.usanpn.org/cpp/education

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp

  • Jarvis A, Lane A, Hijmans RJ (2008) The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126(1):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbarczyk R (2009) The effects of climate change in Poland on the phenological phases of onion (Allium cepa L.) between 1966 and 2005. Agric Conspec Sci 74(4):297–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwembeya EG, Pazvakawambwa L (2019) The changing flowering phenology of Crinum lilies in arid and semi-arid regions: implications for phenological responses to climate change. Biologia. 74:1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00329-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert AM, Miller-Rushing AJ, Inouye DW (2010) Changes in snowmelt date and summer precipitation affect the flowering phenology of Erythronium grandiflorum (glacier lily; Liliaceae). Am J Bot 97:1431–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Llorens L, Peñuelas J (2005) Experimental evidence of future drier and warmer conditions affecting flowering of two co-occurring Mediterranean shrubs. Int J Plant Sci 166(2):235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning J, Smith D (2017) Night hawk: pollination of Pancratium tenuifolium. Veld Flora 103(4) December:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoulides GA (1993) Maximizing power in generalizability studies under budget constraints. J Educ Stat 18(2):197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka Y, Takumi S, Kawahara T (2008) Flowering time diversification and dispersal in central Eurasian wild wheat, Aegilops tauschii Coss.: genealogical and ecological framework. PLoS One 3(9):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews ER, Mazer SJ (2015) Historical changes in flowering phenology are governed by temperature x precipitation interactions in a widespread perennial herb in western North America. New Phytol 210:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn J, Jarvis A, Roberts C, Robertson T (2002) Atlas of Namibia. A portrait of the land and its people. David Philip Publishers, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel AT, Sparks H, Estrella N, Roy DB (2006a) Altered geographic and temporal variability in phenology in response to climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:498–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavska O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Mage F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišova V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski F, Zach S, Zust A (2006b) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol 12:1969–1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack D, Primack RB, Mukunda S (2006) Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. Am J Bot 93:1667–1674

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnár AV, Tökölyi J, Végvári Z, Sramkó G, Sulyok J, Barta Z (2012) Pollination mode predicts phenological response to climate change in terrestrial orchids: a case study from entral Europe. J Ecol 100:1141–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson SM, Sher AA (2015) Long-term shifts in the phenology of rare and endemic Rocky Mountain plants. Am J Bot 102(8):1268–1276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordal I, Duncan T (1984) A cladistics analysis of Haemanthus and Scadoxus. Nord J Bot 4:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordal I, Demissew S, Stabbertorp OE (2001) Endemism in groups of Ethiopian geophytes (“Liliiflorae”). Biol Skr 54:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchen ZA, Primack RB, Anisko T, Lyons RE (2012) Herbarium specimens, photographs, and field observations show Philadelphia area plants are responding to climate change. Am J Bot 99:751–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson KD (2019) Spring- and fall-flowering species show diverging phenological responses to climate in the Southeast USA. Int J Biometeorol 63:481–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Viovy N, Demarty J (2007) Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21:GB3018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proches S, Cowling RM, Goldblatt P, Manning JC, Snijman DA (2006) An overview of the Cape geophytes. Biol J Linn Soc 87:27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjitkar S (2013) Effect of elevation and latitude on spring phenology of rhododendron at Kanchenjunga conservation area, east Nepal. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 1(4):253–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathcke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:179–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiær C (1905) Types biologiques pour la géographie botanique. Oversigt over Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger 1905:347–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Redden R, Yadav SS, Maxted N, Dulloo ME, Guarino L, Smith P (2015) Crop wild relatives and climate change. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New Jersy, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen K, Taulavuori K, Hyvonen T, Gundel PE, Hamilton CE, Vänninen I, Nissinen A, Helander M (2012) Climate change-driven species’ range shifts filtered by photoperiodism. Nat Clim Change 2:239–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52:591–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Holle B, Wei Y, Nickerson D (2010) Climatic variability leads to later seasonal flowering of Floridian plants. PLoS One 5:e11500

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Koenen E (2001) Medicinal, poisonous and edible plants in Namibia. Edition Namibia Vol. 4. Klaus Hess Publishers. Namibia

  • Went F (1949) Ecology of desert plants. II. The effect of rain and temperature on germination and growth. Ecology 30:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngblood D (2004) Identification and quantification of edible plant foods in the upper (Nama) Karoo, South Africa. Econ Bot 58(Supplement):S43–S65

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimudzi C, Archer R, Kwembeya EG, Nordal I (2008) Amaryllidaceae. In: Timberlake J (ed) Flora Zambesiaca Vol 13(2). Royal Bot, Gardens Kew, pp 97–134

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the authorities of the National Botanical Research Institute of Namibia (NBRI) and the Meteorological Services of Namibia for providing herbarium and rainfall data respectively. Mr. D. Aiyambo and Ms. Vanessa Stein from NBRI are acknowledged for helping with data extraction and mapping of the species, respectively. Dr. Timothy Sibanda is thanked for his valuable comments during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezekeil G. Kwembeya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3 Specimens and data used in the study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kwembeya, E.G. Tracking biological footprints of climate change using flowering phenology of the geophytes: Pancratium tenuifolium and Scadoxus multiflorus. Int J Biometeorol 65, 577–586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-02052-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-020-02052-2

Keywords

Navigation