Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the relationship between middle ear risk index (MERI) score and success of tympanoplasty in elderly (≥ 60 years) compared with young patients (18–59 years) and to investigate the prognostic factors affecting the success of tympanoplasty.
Methods
Patients were subdivided into three subgroups according to the MERI score as follows: mild (0–3), moderate (4–6), and severe (≥ 7). Ages, perforation sides and location, preoperative and postoperative audiological results, and the graft success of 29 patients aged over 60 years were compared with those of 52 patients aged between 18 and 59 years.
Results
Preoperative and postoperative air conduction, preoperative and postoperative bone conduction, and preoperative and postoperative air–bone gap (ABG) were higher in the older group compared with the younger group (p < 0.05). The hearing gain in the younger group was 12.63 (6.43), and in the older group was 12.66 (7.85), while did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.689). Results demonstrated that cases with low/moderate score of MERI had a higher graft success rate compared with patients with a high score of MERI (Φ = 0.391; p < 0.001) as well as, patients with low/moderate score of MERI had the lower need for mastoidectomy compared with patients with a high score of MERI (Φ = 0.385; p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Low/medium MERI scores were the variables that provided realistic expectations and increased the success of tympanoplasty more precisely before surgery. The surgeon will also be able to design an operation strategy as a case study for elderly patients by doing so.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emmett JR (1999) Age as a factor in the success of tympanoplasty: a comparison of outcomes in the young and old. Ear Nose Throat J 78:480–483
Migirov L, Lipschitz N, Slonimsky G et al (2014) Efficacy of myringoplasty in older people. Aging Clin Exp Res 26:661–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-014-0221-3
Aoyagi M, Yokota M, Nakamura T, Tojima H, Kanayama R, Fuse T et al (1994) Effects of aging on hearing results in tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 511:81–86. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489409128306
Adkins WY, White B (1984) Type I tympanoplasty: influencing factors. Laryngoscope 94:916–918. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198407000-00011
Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM (2001) Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope 111:1806–1811. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200110000-00026
Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6
Liu LL, Wiener-Kronish JP (2003) Perioperative anesthesia issues in the elderly. Crit Care Clin 19:641–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0704(03)00058-7
Yoshida H, Miyamoto I, Takahashi H (2009) Is sensorineural hearing loss with chronic otitis media due to infection or aging in older patients? Auris Nasus Larynx 36:269–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2008.07.004
Proctor B (1960) A statistical review of 177 tympanoplasties performed in 1957–1958. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 71:469–477. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1960.03770030111023
Shinnabe A, Hara M, Hasegawa M, Matsuzawa S, Kanazawa H, Yoshida N et al (2012) Clinical characteristics and surgical benefits and problems of chronic otitis media and middle ear cholesteatoma in elderly patients older than 70 years. Otol Neurotol 33:1213–1217. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f24ba
Shishegar M, Faramarzi M, Ravari MR (2019) Evaluation of middle ear risk index in patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:2769–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05539-w
Ho KY, Tsai SM, Chai CY, Wang HM (2010) Clinical analysis of intratympanic tympanosclerosis: etiology, ossicular chain findings, and hearing results of surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 130:370–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480903193429
Asiri S, Hahsam A, Al Anazy F, Zakzouk S, Banjar A (1999) Tympanosclerosis: review of literature and incidence among patients with middle-ear infection. J Laryngol Otol 113:1076–1080. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100157937
Demirci S, Tuzuner A, Callıoglu EE, Akdaglı S, Karadaş H, Caylan R (2016) Tympanoplasty outcomes in elderly patients. Auris Nasus Larynx 43:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2015.05.002
Saito T, Tanaka T, Tokuriki M, Shibamori Y, Yamamoto T, Noda I et al (2001) Recent outcome of tympanoplasty in the elderly. Otol Neurotol 22:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200103000-00006
Sakagami M, Maeda A, Node M, Sone M, Mishiro Y (2000) Long-term observation on hearing change in patients with chronic otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx 27:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-8146(99)00065-6
Paparella MM, Brady DR, Hoel R (1970) Sensorineural hearing loss in chronic otitis media and mastoiditis. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 74:108–115
Ahn JH, An YS, Bae JS, Kim do Y, (2012) Postoperative results of tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy in elderly patients with chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121:168–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348941212100305
Balyan FR, Aslan A, Taibah A, Russo A, Sanna M (1997) Mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(6):592–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70038-x
Webb BD, Joseph Chang CY (2008) Efficacy of tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy for chronic suppurative otitis media. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134(11):1155–1158. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.11.1155
Meranda D, Koike K, Shafiei M, Ramadan H (2007) Tympanometric volume: a predictor of success of tympanoplasty in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:189–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.036
Kumar N, Madkikar NN, Kishve S, Chilke D, Shinde KJ (2012) Using middle ear risk index and ET function as parameters for predicting the outcome of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otol 64:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-010-0115-4
Pınar E, Sadullaoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S (2008) Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:386–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.05.623
Denoyelle F, Roger G, Chauvin P, Garabedian EN (1999) Myringoplasty in children: predictive factors of outcome. Laryngoscope 109:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199901000-00010
Belluci R (1973) Dual classification of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 83:1754–1758
Uyar Y, Keles B, Koc S, Ozturk K, Arbag H (2006) Tympanoplasty in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70:1805–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.06.007
Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A, Singh N (2005) Tympanoplasty type 1 in children: an evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.02.016
Funding
The authors declare that they have no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Harran University Faculty of Medicine, reference numbers: 09.09.2019, 19/10/02) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sevil, E., Doblan, A. Significance of the middle ear risk index in predicting tympanoplasty success in the elderly. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 3689–3695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06430-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06430-9