Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsgruppe Elektrophysiologie und Rhythmologie (AGEP)

  • Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsgruppe Elektrophysiologie und Rhythmologie (AGEP)
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Phlips T, Taghji P, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Knecht S, Vandekerckhove Y et al (2018) Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the ‘CLOSE’-protocol. Europace 20(Fi_3):f419–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardoso R, Mendirichaga R, Fernandes G, Healy C, Lambrakos LK, Viles-Gonzalez JF, Goldberger JJ, Mitrani RD (2016) Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 27:1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boveda S, Metzner A, Nguyen DQ, Chun KRJ, Goehl K, Noelker G, Deharo JC, Andrikopoulos G, Dahme T, Lellouche N, Defaye P (2018) Single-Procedure Outcomes and Quality-of-Life Improvement 12 Months Post-Cryoballoon Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the Multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(11):1440–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marrouche NF, Wazni O, McGann C, Greene T, Dean JM, Dagher L, Kholmovski E, Mansour M, Marchlinski F, Wilber D, Hindricks G, Mahnkopf C, Wells D, Jais P, Sanders P, Brachmann J, Bax JJ, Morrison-de Boer L, Deneke T, Calkins H, Sohns C, Akoum N, DECAAF II Investigators. Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (2022) The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 327(23):2296–2305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Assaf AA, Bhagwandien R, Szili-Torok T, Yap SY (2021) Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 32:2424–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dhillon GS, Honarbakhsh S, Di Monaco A, Coling AE, Lenka K, Pizzamiglio F, Hunter RJ, Horton R, Mansour M, Natale A, Reddy V, Grimaldi M, Neuzil P, Tondo C, Schilling RJ (2020) Use of a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter to achieve pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 12-Month outcomes of the RADIANCE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 31(6):1259–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy VY, Al-Ahmad A, Aidietis A, Daly M, Melton I, Hu Y, Sulkin M, Rackauskas G, Ebner A, Hooks DA, Sofi A, Neužil P, Crozier IG (2021) A Novel Visually Guided Radiofrequency Balloon Ablation Catheter for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: One-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter AF-FICIENT I Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 14:e9308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tohoku S, Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Chen C, Bologna F, Chun JKR (2022) Initial clinical experience of pulmonary vein isolation using the ultra-low temperature cryoablation catheter for patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 33(7):1371–1379 (Jul)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravi V, Poudyal A, Abid QUA, Larsen T, Krishnan K, Sharma PS, Trohman RG, Huang HD (2021) High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 23:710–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kottmaier M, Förschner L, Harfoush N, Bourier F, Mayr S, Reents T, Klupp E, Zimmer C, Hadamitzki M, Hendrick E, Krafft H, Lengauer S, Maurer S, Telishevska M, Popa M, Lennerz C, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I (2022) Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation with 90 W for 4 s: outcome, safety, biophysical characteristics and cranial MRI findings in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01146-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yavin H, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A et al (2020) Impact of high power short-duration radio- frequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol Ep 6:973–985

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cochet H, Nakatani Y, Sridi-Cheniti S, Cheniti G, Ramirez FD, Nakashima T, Eggert C, Schneider C, Viswanathan R, Derval N, Duchateau J, Pambrun T, Chauvel R, Reddy VY, Montaudon M, Laurent F, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jais P (2021) Pulsed field ablation selectively spares the oesophagus during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 23:1391–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt B, Bordignon S, Tohoku S, Chen S, Bologna F, Urbanek L, Pansera F, Ernst M, Chun KRJ (2022) 5S Study: Safe and Simple Single Shot Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation Using Sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 15(6):e10817 (Jun)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Anic A, Petru J, Funasako M, Cochet H, Minami K, Breskovic T, Sikiric I (2021) Pulsed Field Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of IMPULSE, PEFCAT, and PEFCAT II. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 5:614–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seitz J, Bars C, Théodore G, Beurtheret S, Lellouche N, Bremondy M, Ferracci A, Faure J, Penaranda G, Yamazaki M, Avula UM, Curel L, Siame S, Berenfeld O, Pisapia A, Kalifa J (2017) AF Ablation Guided by Spatiotemporal Electrogram Dispersion Without Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Wholly Patient-Tailored Approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 24;69(3):303–321 (Jan)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsgruppe Elektrophysiologie und Rhythmologie (AGEP). Herzschr Elektrophys 33, 357–359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-022-00889-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-022-00889-1

Search

Navigation