Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Telerehabilitation: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and future perspectives

  • Review
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an enormous effect on healthcare, notably rehabilitation for neurological, rheumatological, musculoskeletal, and cognitive diseases. Telerehabilitation provides rehabilitation services via multiple modalities, such as real-time chats, computerized consultations, and distant evaluations, emphasizing assessment, diagnosis, and intervention. While the use of telerehabilitation had restrictions before COVID-19, regulatory changes have accelerated its adoption, broadening therapy provision beyond traditional healthcare settings. Telerehabilitation has been examined for its effectiveness in a variety of health concerns, including stroke, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, musculoskeletal disorders, and rheumatic diseases. Despite the constraints of the COVID-19 environment, telerehabilitation settings, which include patient and therapist aspects, have emerged to ensure optimal treatment delivery. Key themes include home-based rehabilitation initiatives, wearable gadgets, and the integration of analytics and artificial intelligence. The growing acceptance of telehealth and telerehabilitation is expected to drive further progress in this discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No stored data set associated with the article.

References

  1. Liguori S, Moretti A, Paoletta M, Gimigliano F, Iolascon G (2021) Rehabilitation of neuromuscular diseases during COVID-19: pitfalls and opportunities. Front Neurol 12:626319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.626319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Maciel FKL, Grossklauss LF, Favero FM, Sá CDSC (2022) Neuromuscular diseases and social distance resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 80:712–717. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Salawu A, Green A, Crooks MG, Brixey N, Ross DH, Sivan M (2020) A Proposal for multidisciplinary tele-rehabilitation in the assessment and rehabilitation of COVID-19 survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:4890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy AL, Duruflé A, Piette P, Fraudet B, Lofficial V, Gallien P (2023) Telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic, what are the determinants of satisfaction for chronic diseases? a retrospective study. Front Rehabil Sci 4:1108087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1108087

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD (2011) Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 31:1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prvu Bettger J, Resnik LJ (2020) Telerehabilitation in the age of COVID-19: an opportunity for learning health system research. Phys Ther 100:1913–1916. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bierman RT, Kwong MW, Calouro C (2018) State occupational and physical therapy telehealth laws and regulations: a 50-state survey. Int J Telerehabil 10:3–54. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2018.6269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Nuara A, Fabbri-Destro M, Scalona E, Lenzi SE, Rizzolatti G, Avanzini P (2022) Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance: an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines. J Neurol 269:627–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10397-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillier S, Inglis-Jassiem G (2010) Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: home or centre based? a systematic review. Int J Stroke 5:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00427.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, Lannin NA, George S, Sherrington C (2020) Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD010255. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Appleby E, Gill ST, Hayes LK, Walker TL, Walsh M, Kumar S (2019) Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 14:e0225150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ownsworth T, Arnautovska U, Beadle E, Shum DHK, Moyle W (2018) Efficacy of telerehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 33:E33–E46. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vellata C, Belli S, Balsamo F, Giordano A, Colombo R, Maggioni G (2021) Effectiveness of telerehabilitation on motor impairments, non-motor symptoms and compliance in patients with parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Front Neurol 12:627999. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.627999

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Seron P, Oliveros MJ, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro RC, Merino-Osorio C, Nahuelhual P, Inostroza J, Jalil Y, Solano R, Marzuca-Nassr GN, Aguilera-Eguía R, Lavados-Romo P, Soto-Rodríguez FJ, Sabelle C, Villarroel-Silva G, Gomolán P, Huaiquilaf S, Sanchez P (2021) Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview. Phys Ther 101:pza053. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Correia FD, Nogueira A, Magalhães I, Guimarães J, Moreira M, Barradas I, Teixeira L, Tulha J, Seabra R, Lains J, Bento V (2018) Home-based rehabilitation with a novel digital biofeedback system versus conventional in-person rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a feasibility study. Sci Rep 8:11299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29668-0

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS (2017) Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 4:e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dias JF, Oliveira VC, Borges PRT, Dutra FCMS, Mancini MC, Kirkwood RN, Resende RA, Sampaio RF (2021) Effectiveness of exercises by telerehabilitation on pain, physical function and quality of life in people with physical disabilities: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials with GRADE recommendations. Br J Sports Med 55:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pastora-Bernal JM, Martín-Valero R, Barón-López FJ, Estebanez-Pérez MJ (2017) Evidence of benefit of telerehabitation after orthopedic surgery: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19:e142. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziade N, Hmamouchi I, El Kibbi L, Daou M, Abdulateef N, Abutiban F, Elzorkany B, Dahou-Makhloufi C, Hamdi W, Al Emadi S, Halabi H, Alnaqbi KA, Abu Al Saoud S, Hashad S, Niamane R, El Rakawi M, Kazkaz L, Saad S, Eissa M, Fraser I, Masri B (2022) Telehealth in rheumatology: the 2021 Arab league of rheumatology best practice guidelines. Rheumatol Int 42:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-05078-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O’Leary SP, Hill AJ, Russell TG (2017) Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil 31:625–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516645148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu YQ, Long Y, Peng WJ, Gong C, Liu YQ, Peng XM, Zhong YB, Luo Y, Wang MY (2023) The efficacy and safety of telerehabilitation for fibromyalgia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 25:e42090. https://doi.org/10.2196/42090

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hormaza-Jaramillo A, Arredondo A, Forero E, Herrera S, Ochoa C, Arbeláez-Cortés Á, Fernandez Aldana AR, Rodriguez A, Amador L, Castaño N, Reyes J (2022) Effectiveness of telemedicine compared with standard care for patients with rheumatic diseases: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 28:1852–1860. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MacIver A, Hollinger H, Carolan C (2021) Tele-health interventions to support self-management in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 41:1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04907-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Naveen R, Sundaram TG, Agarwal V, Gupta L (2021) Teleconsultation experience with the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a prospective observational cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatol Int 41:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04737-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Thurah A, Bosch P, Marques A, Meissner Y, Mukhtyar CB, Knitza J, Najm A, Østerås N, Pelle T, Knudsen LR, Šmucrová H, Berenbaum F, Jani M, Geenen R, Krusche M, Pchelnikova P, de Souza S, Badreh S, Wiek D, Piantoni S, Gwinnutt JM, Duftner C, Canhão HM, Quartuccio L, Stoilov N, Prior Y, Bijlsma JW, Zabotti A, Stamm TA, Dejaco C (2022) 2022 EULAR points to consider for remote care in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 81:1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutter-Leve R, Passint E, Ness D, Rindflesch A (2021) The caregiver experience after stroke in a COVID-19 environment: a qualitative study in inpatient rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther 45:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahely A, Kai Ning Hew S, Ka Chan Y, Soundy A, Rosewilliam S (2023) Exploring the experiences of people who had a stroke and therapists who managed people with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative study. PLoS ONE 18:e0282325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Park HY, Jung J, Park HY, Lee SH, Kim ES, Kim HB, Song KH (2020) Psychological consequences of survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia 1 month after discharge. J Korean Med Sci 35:e409. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim HS (2021) Towards telemedicine adoption in Korea: 10 practical recommendations for physicians. J Korean Med Sci 36:e103. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kataria S, Ravindran V (2018) Digital health: a new dimension in rheumatology patient care. Rheumatol Int 38:1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4037-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cappa P, Clerico A, Nov O, Porfiri M (2013) Can force feedback and science learning enhance the effectiveness of neuro-rehabilitation? an experimental study on using a low-cost 3D joystick and a virtual visit to a zoo. PLoS ONE 8:e83945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083945

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Golomb MR, Warden SJ, Fess E, Rabin B, Yonkman J, Shirley B, Burdea GC (2011) Maintained hand function and forearm bone health 14 months after an in-home virtual-reality videogame hand telerehabilitation intervention in an adolescent with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 26:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073810394847

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nuara A, Avanzini P, Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M (2019) Efficacy of a home-based platform for child-to-child interaction on hand motor function in unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 61:1314–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bashkirtsev O, Gaevska V, Zimba O, Gasparyan AY (2022) Comprehensive and multidisciplinary rehabilitation in the time of crisis. Anti Aging East Eur 1(2):92–95. https://doi.org/10.56543/aaeeu.2022.1.2.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Milani G, Demattè G, Ferioli M, Dallagà G, Lavezzi S, Basaglia N, Straudi S (2021) Telerehabilitation in Italy during the COVID-19 lockdown: a feasibility and acceptability study. Int J Telerehabil 13:e6334. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2021.6334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Antoniou V, Davos CH, Kapreli E, Batalik L, Panagiotakos DB, Pepera G (2022) Effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation, using wearable sensors, as a multicomponent, cutting-edge intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 11:3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133772

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Arntz A, Weber F, Handgraaf M, Lällä K, Korniloff K, Murtonen KP, Chichaeva J, Kidritsch A, Heller M, Sakellari E, Athanasopoulou C, Lagiou A, Tzonichaki I, Salinas-Bueno I, Martínez-Bueso P, Velasco-Roldán O, Schulz RJ, Grüneberg C (2023) Technologies in home-based digital rehabilitation: scoping review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 10:e43615. https://doi.org/10.2196/43615

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Vourganas I, Stankovic V, Stankovic L (2020) Individualised responsible artificial intelligence for home-based rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel) 21:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010002

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang AY, Cullen MR, Harrington RA, Barry M (2021) The impact of novel coronavirus COVID-19 on noncommunicable disease patients and health systems: a review. J Intern Med 289:450–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: KBF, AMI, YM. Data acquisition and review of the literature: KBF, AMI, YM. Interpretations: KBF, AMI, YM. Writing—review and editing: KBF, AMI, YM. Final approval: KBF, AMI, YM.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burhan Fatih Kocyigit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

No requirement for ethics committee approval.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kocyigit, B.F., Assylbek, M.I. & Yessirkepov, M. Telerehabilitation: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and future perspectives. Rheumatol Int 44, 577–582 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05537-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05537-0

Keywords

Navigation