Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating Mechanisms of Short-term Woodland Salamander Response to Forest Management

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary forest management often requires meeting diverse ecological objectives including maintaining ecosystem function and promoting biodiversity through timber harvesting. Wildlife are essential in this process by providing ecological services that can facilitate forest resiliency in response to timber harvesting. However, the mechanisms driving species’ responses remain ambiguous. The goal of this study was to assess mechanisms influencing eastern red-backed salamander (RBS; Plethodon cinereus) response to overstory cover removal. We evaluated two mitigation strategies for the RBS in response to overstory removal. We used a before-after-control-impact design to study how (1) retaining residual trees or (2) eliminating soil compaction affected RBS surface counts and body condition index (BCI) up to two-years post-treatment. Additionally, we assessed how surface counts of RBS were influenced by overstory tree cover. Surface counts of RBS were not strongly influenced by overstory removal when tree residuals were retained. Body condition index increased in treatments where harvest residuals were retained. In treatments where soil compaction was eliminated, surface counts and BCI were inversely related. Finally, surface counts from both mitigation strategies were not strongly influenced by overstory cover. Overall, both mitigation techniques appeared to ameliorate impacts of overstory removal on RBS. These results highlight the importance of understanding mechanisms driving species’ responses to forest management. To reduce the perceived negative effects of overstory removal on RBS, incorporating these mitigation measures may contribute to the viability and stability of RBS populations. Incorporating species’ life history traits into management strategies could increase continuity of ecological function and integrity through harvesting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR) for access to housing and study sites during the study. Additional educational funding assistance was provided by the Appalachian Vegetation Management Association. We thank WVDNR and Wildlife Management Institute employees for implementation of harvests and all the technicians that helped collect field data for this project. Donald Brown was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis projects WVA00122 and WVA00820, the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service Northern Research Station. Salamander sampling was conducted under methods approved by the WVDNR (Permits 2016.143, 2017.104, 2018.110, and 2019.110) and the West Virginia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 1602000305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric L. Margenau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Margenau, E.L., Wood, P.B., Brown, D.J. et al. Evaluating Mechanisms of Short-term Woodland Salamander Response to Forest Management. Environmental Management 71, 321–333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01735-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01735-3

Keywords

Navigation