Abstract
Background
When other techniques are unavailable or cannot be performed, the finger bank (FB) procedure becomes viable to reconstruct mutilating hand injuries. The aim of the present study was to synthesize all the current literature and evaluate the studies outcomes using the FB, determining its effectiveness.
Methods
A comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in multiple databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, Cochrane, and Lilacs).
Results
Fifteen articles were included. Although most patients presented functional recovery, the FB technique should be used with caution in skin, bone, and tendon as a tissue bank, considering the limited number of studies in the current literature focusing on these tissues. On the other hand, in cases of joint, nerve, and vessel recovery, the use of FB may be safely recommended. Furthermore, we observed that most procedures were emergency and work-related, in addition to the vast majority of patients being men (90.34%). We found that the FB can be extended to rare non-emergency situations (tumor resection and congenital malformation) and used regardless of clinical features such as age of participants or mechanism of injury.
Conclusions
Overall, this systematic review highlighted the great prognosis that the FB can offer to traumatic multidigit patients and emphasized the lack of research in this area.
Level of evidence: Not gradable
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data collected for the study, including deidentified participant data and informed consent form, will be available for one year after publication of the article upon justified request to the e-mail address of the main researcher and with a signed data access agreement.
References
Şahin F, Akca H, Akkaya N, Zincir ÖD, Işik A (2013) Cost analysis and related factors in patients with traumatic hand injury. J Hand Surg Eur 38(6):673–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412469012
Riah Y, Balaguer T, Médard de Chardon V, Chignon-Sicard B, Dannan E, Lebreton E (2010) Utilisation des « tissus-banque » en chirurgie de la main d’urgence. Chir Main 29(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2009.11.003
Schoofs M, Raoult S, Fevrier P et al (1994) Stratégie du doigt banque. Ann Chir la Main 13(4):240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0753-9053(05)80002-X
Foucher G, Hoang P, Citron N, Merle M, Dury M (1986) Joint reconstruction following trauma: Comparison of microsurgical transfer and conventional methods: a report of 61 cases. J Hand Surg Am 11(3):388–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(86)90164-6
Foucher G, Citron N, Merle M, Dury M (1987) Free compound transfer of the distal interphalangeal joint. A case report J Reconstr Microsurg 3(4):297–300. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006999
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syt Rev, the BMJ 372(71):89.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009. Accessed 20 March 2021.
Abdelshaheed ME (2020) Classification and clinical evaluation of “spare parts” procedures in mutilating hand injuries. Hand Surg Rehabil 40(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2020.10.008
Allieu Y (2010) Passé, présent et avenir des transferts osseux vascularisés à la main et au poignet. Chir Main 29(1):S3–S10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2010.09.001
Balaguer T, Médard de Chardon V, Winter M, Lebreton E (2008) Vascularized transfer of the whole flexor apparatus from a finger to another: the use of the spare-parts concept applied to a case of electrical burn. Burns 34(1):131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.08.042
Coulet B, Lacombe F, Daussin PA, Chammas M (2004) Mains de « blast »: Stratégie thérapeutique. Chir Main 23(5):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2004.08.009
Dreant N, Balaguer T, Martinage A, Lebreton E (2004) Replantation digitale hétérotopique chez un homme de 80 ans. Chir Main 23(2):114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2004.02.007
Fansa H, Frerichs O, Schneider W (2002) Freie mikrovaskuläre transplantation des proximalen interphalangealgelenkes zur primäiren rekonstruktion des grundgelenkes. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plast Chir 34(3):205–208. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33694
Hierner R, Berger AK (2008) Long-term results after vascularised joint transfer for finger joint reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 61(11):1338–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.035
Hierner R, Berger AK, Shen ZL (2007) Vascularized joint transfer for finger joint reconstruction. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plast Chir 39(4):249–256. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965229
Machol JA, Fang RC, Matloub HS (2013) The free fillet flap after traumatic amputation: a review of literature and case report. Hand 8(4):487–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-013-9530-9
Poiret G, Aljudaibi N, Wavreille G (2016) Use of an index finger as a bank in thumb reconstruction after tumor resection: about one case. Hand Surg Rehabil 35(2):144–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2015.12.006
Truffandier MV, Perrot P, Duteille F (2016) Spare-parts concept in pediatric hand: about one bilateral syndactyly. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 61(2):145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2015.04.005
HealthLinkBC. Finger, Hand, and Wrist Injuries. Available from: https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/illnesses-conditions/injuries/finger-hand-and-wrist-injuries. Accessed 20 March 2021.
Funding
The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Informed consent
Patients provided written consent for the use of their data and photographs.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research comittee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. In accordance with Brazilian laws, the Ethics Comittee at Pontificial Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) has confirmed that no ethical approval is required for this kind of studies.
Conflict of interest
Jefferson Braga Silva, Alice Scalzilli Becker, Bruna Leiria Meréje Leal, Catarina Vellinho Busnello, Arthur Henrique Weiler Furlanetto, Mariana Rodrigues de Sousa Rebelato and Rafael Braccio Zawislak declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, J.B., Becker, A.S., Leal, B.L.M. et al. A systematic review of the finger bank technique: what are its limits?. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 795–801 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02056-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02056-2