Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Twenty-four months of follow-up in women with rebound-associated vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a single-centre case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Evidence on the management of rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation is scarce. This study describes seven patients retreated with denosumab, teriparatide or zoledronate for 24 months. Their bone mineral density remained stable or improved and no new fractures occurred suggesting that all three options might be adequate for their treatment.

Purpose

To describe the densitometric and biochemical changes achieved with osteoactive treatment after 24 months of follow-up in patients who suffered rebound-associated vertebral fractures (RAVFs) after Dmab discontinuation, and to report the occurrence of new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures.

Methods

Patients with RAVFs who received retreatment (RT) for 24 months were included. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH), along with C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, osteocalcin, and bone alkaline phosphatase. Data were collected at the start of the RT and after 24 months.

Results

Seven female patients were included. RT consisted in Dmab (n = 3), teriparatide (TPT) (n = 3) and zoledronate (Zol) (n = 1). At 24 months, the mean BMD change was 2.2% at LS, 6.8% at FN and 3.8% at TH in the Dmab group, 7.5% at LS, 1.4% at FN and 3.7% at TH in the TPT group and, 5.0% at LS, 0.6% at FN and 3.9% at TH in the patient with Zol. After 24 months of follow-up, no patient suffered new fractures.

Conclusion

In this series of patients with RAVFs, we did not observe any new fractures and the BMD remained stable after 24 months of RT. Future studies are needed to evaluate the most suitable treatment approach after RAVFs but these preliminary data suggest that all denosumab, zoledronate and teriparatide might be adequate options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, MBZ, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Zanchetta MB, Boailchuk J, Massari F, Silveira F, Bogado C, Zanchetta JR (2018) Significant bone loss after stopping long-term denosumab treatment: a post FREEDOM study. Osteoporos Int 29(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4242-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamy O, Stoll D, Aubry-Rozier B, Rodriguez EG (2019) Stopping Denosumab. Curr Osteoporos Rep 17(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4. (Erratum.In:CurrOsteoporosRep.2022Oct;20(5):363)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Popp AW, Zysset PK, Lippuner K (2016) Rebound-associated vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab-from clinic and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int 27(5):1917–1921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3458-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anastasilakis AD, Makras P (2016) Multiple clinical vertebral fractures following denosumab discontinuation. Osteoporos Int 27(5):1929–1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3459-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burckhardt P, Faouzi M, Buclin T, Lamy O; The Swiss Denosumab Study Group (2021) Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: A Retrospective Study of 797 Cases. J Bone Miner Res 36(9):1717–1728. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4335

  6. Cosman F, Huang S, McDermott M, Cummings SR (2022) Multiple Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension Trials Additional Post Hoc Analyses. J Bone Miner Res 37(11):2112–2120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, Body JJ, Gonzalez Rodriguez E, Anastasilakis AD, Abrahamsen B, McCloskey E, Hofbauer LC, Guañabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Pepe J, Palermo A, Langdahl B (2020) Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab: dgaa756. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa756

  8. Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Makras P, Trovas G, Yavropoulou MP, Tournis S (2021) Efficacy of Antiosteoporotic Medications in Patients With Rebound-Associated Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation. J Clin Densitom 24(4):591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2021.01.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelegrin C, Farías V, Jerkovich F and Zanchetta MB. What to do after Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures Following Denosumab Dicontinuation? A real Life Study. Osteoporos Int (2022) 32 (Suppl 1):S119–S410. P 810

  10. Farias V. Morejon Barragan A, Pereyra A, Jerkovich F, Gonzalez Pernas M, Abdala R, Longobardi V, Zanchetta MB. The three-year effect of biphosphonates on bone mineral density after denosumab withdrawal: observations from a realworld study. In: 2023 WCO-IOF-ESCEO Congress; May 4–7, 2023; Barcelona, Spain; P794

  11. Leder BZ, Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Wallace PM, Lee H, Neer RM, Burnett-Bowie SA (2015) Denosumab and teriparatide transitions in postmenopausal osteoporosis (the DATA-Switch study): extension of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(9999):1147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61120-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Anastasilakis AD, Trovas G, Balanika A, Polyzos SA, Makras P, Tournis S (2021) Progression of Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures Following Denosumab Discontinuation Despite Reinstitution of Treatment: Suppressing Increased Bone Turnover May Not Be Enough. J Clin Densitom. 24(2):338–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2020.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are sincerely grateful to Susana Carballo for proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Belén Zanchetta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in this study.

Conflicts of interest

Dolores Clifton Goldney, Carolina Pelegrin, Fernando Jerkovich, Vanesa Longobardi, Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez, and María Belén Zanchetta declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clifton Goldney, D., Pelegrin, C., Jerkovich, F. et al. Twenty-four months of follow-up in women with rebound-associated vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a single-centre case series. Osteoporos Int 35, 165–171 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06894-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-023-06894-5

Keywords

Navigation