Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of different electrical nerve stimulation protocols for treating adults with non-neurogenic overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Electrical nerve stimulation is a widely used treatment for overactive bladder but there is no consensus regarding the best placement of electrodes or protocols. We hypothesised that some non-implanted neurostimulation protocols would be more effective compared to others for treating urinary symptoms and improving quality of life among adults diagnosed with non-neurogenic overactive bladder.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials were performed in five electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Lilacs, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PEDro. The main outcome was urinary symptoms—frequency, nocturia, and urgency—and the secondary outcome quality of life. Some protocol characteristics were extracted, e.g., frequency, pulse width, intensity, intervention time, and electrode placement.

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials were included. Tibial neurostimulation showed better results than sacral neurostimulation for urge incontinence (mean difference = 1.25 episodes, 95% CI, 0.12–2.38, n = 73). On the pooled analysis, the different neurostimulation protocols—intravaginal, percutaneous tibial, and transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation—demonstrated similar results for urinary frequency, nocturia, and urgency as well as quality of life. In general, effect sizes from meta-analyses were low to moderate. The best reported parameters for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation were 20-Hz frequency and 200-μs width, once a week.

Conclusions

There was evidence that tibial neurostimulation is more effective than sacral neurostimulation for urge incontinence symptoms among patients with non-neurogenic overactive bladder. Overall, there was no superiority of an electrical nerve stimulation electrode placement and protocol over others considering urinary symptoms and quality of life. Further studies with three-arm trials are necessary. This study was registered at PROSPERO: CRD4201810071.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OAB:

Overactive bladder

QoL:

Quality of life

ICIQ-OAB:

International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder

I-QOL:

Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument

OAB-q SF:

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form

MD:

Mean difference

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):116–26. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.125704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Soler R, Gomes CM, Averbeck MA, Koyama M. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in Brazil: results from the epidemiology of LUTS (Brazil LUTS) study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(4):1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193(5):1572–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White N, Iglesia CB. Overactive bladder. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2016;43(1):59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Truzzi JC, Gomes CM, Bezerra CA, et al. Overactive bladder - 18 years - part II. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(2):199–214. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wibisono E, Rahardjo HE. Effectiveness of short term percutaneous Tibial nerve stimulation for non-neurogenic overactive bladder syndrome in adults: A Meta-analysis. Acta Med Indones. 2015;47(3):188–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leng WW, Chancellor MB. How sacral nerve stimulation neuromodulation works. Urol Clin North Am. 2005;32(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2004.09.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NICE. Urinary incontinence in women: urinary incontinence in women: management management clinical guideline. 2013:1–50.

  9. Stewart F, Lf G, ED R, Mo G, Kapoor A, Jl A. Electrical stimulation with non-implanted electrodes for overactive bladder in adults (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD010098. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010098.pub3.www.cochranelibrary.com.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jerez-Roig J, Souza DLB, Espelt A, Costa-Marín M, Belda-Molina AM. Pelvic floor electrostimulation in women with urinary incontinence and/or overactive bladder syndrome: A systematic review. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2013;37(7):429–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2012.08.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Booth J, Connelly L, Dickson S, Duncan F, Lawrence M. The effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for adults with overactive bladder syndrome: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(2):528–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang M, Jian Z, Ma Y, Jin X, Li H, Wang K. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04429-8.

  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated march 2011]. The cochrane collaboration; 2011.

  15. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Menezes Franco M, de Oliveira SF, Mateus CL, de Vasconcelos E, et al. Evaluation of quality of life and loss urine of women with overactive bladder treated with intravaginal or tibial nerve electro stimulation. Fisioter e Pesqui. 2011;18(2):145–50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502011000200008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacomo RH, Alves AT, Lucio A, Garcia PA, Lorena DCR, de Sousa JB. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus parasacral stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder in elderly people: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020;75:e1477. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teixeira Alve A, Azevedo Garcia P, Henriques Jácomo R, et al. Effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation at two different thresholds for overactive bladder symptoms in older women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Maturitas. 2020;135:40–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. dos Santos BR, Gomes JL, Pompermayer RCL, Abreu GKP. Os benefícios da eletroestimulação transcutânea via nervo tibial posterior e parassacral no tratamento de bexiga hiperativa. Fisioter Bras. 2019;20(2):239–48. https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v20i2.2420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Surbala L, Ratan Khuman P, Mital V, Devanshi B. Neuromodulation for overactive bladder with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in adults – a randomized clinical study. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2014;5(4):671–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ugurlucan FG, Onal M, Aslan E, Ayyildiz Erkan H, Kizilkaya Beji N, Yalcin O. Comparison of the effects of electrical stimulation and posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2013;75(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vecchioli Scaldazza C, Morosetti C, Giampieretti R, Lorenzetti R, Baroni M. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin-Garcia M, Crampton J. A single-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in overactive bladder symptoms in women responders to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Physiotherapy. 2019;105(4):469–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramírez-García I, Blanco-Ratto L, Kauffmann S, Carralero-Martínez A, Sánchez E. Efficacy of transcutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve compared to percutaneous stimulation in idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: randomized control trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(1):261–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Even-Schneider A, et al. Urodynamic effect of acute transcutaneous posterior Tibial nerve stimulation in overactive bladder. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2210–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067446.17576.bd.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernandez N, Chua ME, Ming JM, Zu’bi JMSF, Santos J, Lorenzo AJ, Braga LH, Lopes RI. Neurostimulation therapy for nonneurogenic overactive bladder in children: A Meta-analysis. Urol. 2017;110:201–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nüesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, et al. The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2009;339:b3244. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Higgins JPT, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR, et al. Guidelines on urinary incontinence.; European association of. Urology. 2014; https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/20-Urinary-Incontinence_LR.pdf.

  30. Kamboonlert K, Panyasriwanit S, Tantisiriwat N, Kitisomprayoonkul W. Effects of Bilateral Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity in Spinal Cord Injury: A Urodynamic Study. Arch Phys MedRehabil. 102(6):1165–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.130.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Marcos de Noronha from LaTrobe University for supporting the meta-analysis process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K. Zomkowski: Protocol/project development; Data collection or management; Formal analysis; Methodology; Project administration; Manuscript writing/editing. I. Kammers: Data collection or management; Formal analysis; Methodology; Manuscript writing/editing. B. B. Hugen Back: Data collection or management; Formal analysis; Methodology; Manuscript writing/editing. G. M. Moreira: Validation; Visualization; Manuscript writing/editing. A. Sonza: Protocol/project development; Validation; Manuscript writing/editing. C. Sacomori: Protocol/project development; Methodology; Validation; Manuscript writing/editing. F. F. Sperandio: Protocol/project development; Methodology; Validation; Visualization; Manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cinara Sacomori.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zomkowski, K., Kammers, I., Back, B.B.H. et al. The effectiveness of different electrical nerve stimulation protocols for treating adults with non-neurogenic overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 33, 1045–1058 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05088-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05088-7

Keywords

Navigation