Abstract
Purpose
A feasibility study to evaluate the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra (CIVCO Radiotherapy & Qfix, Coralville, IA, USA) as a customised immobilisation device for patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy was conducted.
Methods
A total of 34 patients with large pendulous breasts were fitted with the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra during RT. A mixed-method questionnaire was administered to both radiation therapists (RTTs) and patients. RTTs evaluated the effectiveness of the bra in setup. Patients appraised its comfort level and ease of wearing. Setup reproducibility was evaluated based on a departmental imaging protocol. Acute skin side effects were documented with photos and assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) classification.
Results
Of the patients, 27 (79.4%) completed the questionnaire. 23 patients felt comfortable wearing the bra while 20 felt less exposed during treatment. Reproducibility was acceptable, with a median (range) setup error (isocentre) of 0.0 cm (−0.6 to 0.7 cm; left/right), −0.1 cm (−0.5 to 1.2 cm; posterior) and 0.2 cm (−0.5 to 0.9 cm; inferior) achieved based on matched field borders on skin. However, repeated setups and imaging were required for 3 patients due to large breast size (cups D–G; size 4–5). Minimal skin toxicity (grade 0–1) was observed. No grade ≥ 2 was reported. 10 RTTs completed the survey. Male RTTs (n = 4) were not confident in assisting patients with bra fitting. 8 RTTs agreed that although it was difficult to reproduce the breast tissue for treatment, it helped patients to maintain the treatment position.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated the feasibility of using a customised bra which provided optimal setup reproducibility while maintaining minimal skin toxicity and patient comfort, especially the value-added modesty felt among Asian women during their breast cancer radiotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
08 September 2023
The ORCID of E. P. P. Pang has been added.
References
Office NRoD (2019) Singapore cancer registry annual report 2019
McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J, Zhang P, Freedman GM (2016) Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med 57(Suppl 1):9S–16S
Jatoi I, Proschan MA (2005) Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 28:289–294
Haviland JS, A’Hern R, Bentzen SM, Whelan T, Bliss JM (2014) Radiotherapy for breast cancer, the TARGIT‑A trial. Lancet 383:1716–1717
Pignol JP, Vu TT, Mitera G, Bosnic S, Verkooijen HM, Truong P (2015) Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:157–164
Meattini I, Guenzi M, Fozza A, Vidali C, Rovea P, Meacci F et al (2017) Overview on cardiac, pulmonary and cutaneous toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 24:52–62
Ratosa I, Jenko A, Oblak I (2018) Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiol Oncol 52:233–244
Bentel GC, Marks LB, Whiddon CS, Prosnitz LR (1999) Acute and late morbidity of using a breast positioning ring in women with large/pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 50:277–281
Das IJ, Cheng CW, Fein DA, Fowble B (1997) Patterns of dose variability in radiation prescription of breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 44:83–89
Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li J, Eisenberg DF, Hanlon AL, Wang L et al (2006) Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) decreases acute skin toxicity for women receiving radiation for breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 29:66–70
Goodman KA, Hong L, Wagman R, Hunt MA, McCormick B (2004) Dosimetric analysis of a simplified intensity modulation technique for prone breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:95–102
Latimer JG, Beckham W, West M, Holloway L, Delaney G (2005) Support of large breasts during tangential irradiation using a micro-shell and minimizing the skin dose—a pilot study. Med Dosim 30:31–35
Remouchamps VM, Letts N, Yan D, Vicini FA, Moreau M, Zielinski JA et al (2003) Three-dimensional evaluation of intra- and interfraction immobilization of lung and chest wall using active breathing control: a reproducibility study with breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:968–978
Buijsen J, Jager JJ, Bovendeerd J, Voncken R, Borger JH, Boersma LJ et al (2007) Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 82:337–340
Ferrari A, Ivaldi G, Leonardi MC, Rondi E, Orecchia R (2009) Prone breast radiotherapy in a patient with early stage breast cancer and a large pendulous breast. Tumori 95:394–397
Merchant TE, McCormick B (1994) Prone position breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:197–203
Moody AM, Mayles WP, Bliss JM, A’Hern RP, Owen JR, Regan J et al (1994) The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity. Radiother Oncol 33:106–112
Barrett-Lennard MJTS (2013) Comparing immobilisation methods for the tangential treatment of large pendulous breasts. Radiographer 55:7–13
Keller L, Cohen R, Sopka DM, Li T, Li L, Anderson PR et al (2013) Effect of bra use during radiotherapy for large-breasted women: acute toxicity and treated heart and lung volumes. Pract Radiat Oncol 3:9–15
Group ST, Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ et al (2008) The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 9:331–341
Murray Brunt A, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, Sydenham MA, Alhasso A, Bloomfield DJ et al (2020) Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5‑year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 395:1613–1626
Coles C (2020) Guidelines on radiation therapy for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents. Accessed 1 June 2022
Mulliez T, Veldeman L, van Greveling A, Speleers B, Sadeghi S, Berwouts D et al (2013) Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with large breasts: a randomized trial comparing prone and supine positions. Radiother Oncol 108:203–208
Veldeman L, Schiettecatte K, De Sutter C, Monten C, van Greveling A, Berkovic P et al (2016) The 2‑year cosmetic outcome of a randomized trial comparing prone and supine whole-breast irradiation in large-breasted women. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1210–1217
Veldeman L, Speleers B, Bakker M, Jacobs F, Coghe M, De Gersem W et al (2010) Preliminary results on setup precision of prone-lateral patient positioning for whole breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:111–118
Boute B, De Neve W, Speleers B, Van Greveling A, Monten C, Van Hoof T et al (2017) Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:200–205
Mulla Z, Iskanderani O, Weber A, AlMohamad A, Al-Amoodi MS, Soaida S (2021) Comparing accuracy of thermoplastic mask versus commercial bra for the immobilization of pendulous breast during radiation therapy treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Adv Radiat Oncol 6:100592
Agostinelli SGS, Bellini A, Pupillo F, Guenzi M, Bosetti D, Blandino G, Taccini G (2015) Helical Tomotherapy of the breast: can thermoplastic immobilization improve the reproducibility of the treatment setup and the accuracy of the delivered dose? Phys Med 31:49–53
Cheng KF, Wu VW (2014) Comparison of the effectiveness of different immobilization systems in different body regions using daily megavoltage CT in helical tomotherapy. Br J Radiol 87:20130494
Rudat V, Nour A, Ghaida SA, Alaradi A (2016) Impact of hypofractionation and tangential beam IMRT on the acute skin reaction in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 11:100
Murray Brunt A, Wheatley DA, Arnold J, Somaiah N, Kelly S, Harnett A et al (2016) Acute skin toxicity associated with a 1-week schedule of whole breast radiotherapy compared with a standard 3‑week regimen delivered in the UK FAST-Forward Trial. Radiother Oncol 120:114–118
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
J.Z. Chua, L.H. Lim, E.P.P. Pang and G. Kusumawidjaja declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
The authors JZ Chua and LH Lim contributed equally to the manuscript.
Supplementary Information
66_2023_2131_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Questionnaires for patients (top) to evaluate their comfort level and radiation therapists (RTT) (bottom) to assess the issues related to the use of immobilisation bra.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chua, J.Z., Lim, L.H., Pang, E.P.P. et al. Use of immobilisation bra for daily setup of patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 200, 287–295 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02131-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02131-4